首页> 外文期刊>Journal of clinical nursing >Patients' self-reported nausea: Validation of the Numerical Rating Scale and of a daily summary of repeated Numerical Rating Scale scores
【24h】

Patients' self-reported nausea: Validation of the Numerical Rating Scale and of a daily summary of repeated Numerical Rating Scale scores

机译:患者的自我报告的恶心:验证数值评级规模和反复数值评定尺度分数的日常概要

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Aim and objectives To validate the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) for postoperative nausea assessments, and determine whether a central tendency, median, based on patients' self-rated nausea is a clinically applicable daily measure to describe patients' nausea after major surgery. Background Postoperative nausea causes major discomfort, risks for complications and prolonged hospital stays. The NRS is recommended for the assessment of pain but is little explored for assessing nausea. Design A repeated measure design was carried out on patients who had undergone major surgery in three Swedish hospitals. Methods Nonparametric statistical methods were used to analyse (a) associations between the NRS and a verbal scale (no, mild, moderate and severe) and (b) to analyse associations between Measure 1 (nausea scores postoperative Day 1) and Measure 2 (retrospective nausea scores at rest and during activity, postoperative Day 2). Reporting of this research adheres to the Strobe Guidelines. Results The mean age of the 479 patients (44% women) in the sample was 65 years (range, 22-93 years). Self-assessed nausea scores from the NRS and the verbal scale correlated well (r(Spearman) = 0.79). Correlation between nausea at rest and nausea during activity was r(Spearman) = 0.81. The calculated median scores (Measure 1) showed only moderate correlations with retrospective nausea scores (Measure 2); 4-9 ratings, r(Spearman) = 0.41; 6-9 ratings, r(Spearman) = 0.54. Conclusions Numeric Rating Scale scores showed strong associations with a verbal scale; therefore, the NRS seems to be a valid tool to measure nausea intensity. The quality of daily summarised median nausea scores needs to be further explored before clinical use. Relevance to clinical practice The use of the NRS in assessments of nausea in postoperative care will facilitate communication between patients and health care professionals regarding nausea intensity. When documenting nausea, it seems unnecessary to distinguish nausea at rest from nausea during activity.
机译:旨在验证术后恶心评估的数字评级规模(NRS),并确定基于患者自我评价的恶心的中央趋势是否是临床适用的日常措施,以描述主要手术后患者的恶心。背景技术术后恶心会导致重大的不适,并发症和长期住院的风险。建议评估疼痛的NRS,但探索评估恶心。设计了一项重复的测量设计,对三个瑞典医院进行了重大手术的患者进行了。方法使用非参数统计方法分析(A)NRS和口头尺度(NO,轻度,中等和严重)和(B)之间的关联,以分析测量1(恶心术后第1天)和测量2(回顾性恶心评分在休息和活动期间,术后第2天)。报告这项研究涉及频闪指南。结果样品中479名患者(44%)的平均年龄为65岁(范围,22-93岁)。来自NRS的自我评估恶心和口头比例相关井(R(Spearman)= 0.79)。在活性期间休息和恶心之间的相关性是R(Spearman)= 0.81。计算的中值分数(测量1)显示与回顾性恶心评分的中等相关性(测量2); 4-9评分,R(Spearman)= 0.41; 6-9评分,R(Spearman)= 0.54。结论数值评级规模分数显示出强烈的关联,口头缩放;因此,NRS似乎是测量恶心强度的有效工具。在临床用途之前,需要进一步探索每日总结中位数恶心的评分。与临床实践的相关性,NRS在术后护理评估中的使用将促进患者和医疗保健专业人员对恶心强度的沟通。记录恶心时,似乎不必在活动期间从恶心休息的恶心。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号