首页> 外文期刊>Journal of clinical neuroscience: official journal of the Neurosurgical Society of Australasia >Minimally clinically important differences for the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ) following decompression surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis
【24h】

Minimally clinically important differences for the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ) following decompression surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis

机译:在减压手术对腰椎狭窄的减压手术后,对日本骨科缔合科期疼痛评估问卷(Joabpeq)的微小临床重要差异

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Decompression surgery is the standard treatment in lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). Recent studies have shown that patient satisfaction following decompression surgery does not correspond well with outcomes measured by conventional patient-reported outcome measurements. Recent study reported that the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ) is the most accurate outcome measurement to reflect patient satisfaction. Nevertheless, the JOABPEQ was not studied enough, especially along with the minimally clinically important differences (MCIDs), as JOABPEQ is relatively new questionnaire. The MCID is the minimum score change which patients perceive as beneficial. Thus, knowing the MUD is critical evaluating the efficacy of intervention. The aim of this study was to determine the MCIDs of the JOABPEQ for patients with LSS undergoing decompression surgery.
机译:减压手术是腰椎狭窄(LSS)的标准治疗。 最近的研究表明,在减压手术后患者满意度与常规患者报告的结果测量测量的结果不相同。 最近的研究报告称,日本骨科恢复疼痛评估问卷(Joabpeq)是最准确的结果测量,以反映患者满意度。 尽管如此,Joabpeq没有足够的研究,特别是随着Joabpeq的最小临床重要差异(MCID)。 MCID是患者认为有益的最低分数变化。 因此,了解泥浆是关键评估干预的功效。 本研究的目的是为LSS患者确定joabpeq的MCID,接受减压手术。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号