首页> 外文期刊>Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology >Left atrial voltage mapping with a direction‐independent grid catheter: Comparison with?a conventional circular mapping catheter
【24h】

Left atrial voltage mapping with a direction‐independent grid catheter: Comparison with?a conventional circular mapping catheter

机译:用方向 - 独立的栅极导管左心房电压映射:与函数的比较?传统的圆形映射导管

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Abstract Introduction A recently introduced grid mapping catheter (GMC) is designed for better electrode‐tissue contact and can collect bipolar signals both along and across the splines, which may allow more efficient voltage map generation independent of propagation direction. We compared the GMC with a conventional circular mapping catheter (CMC) for left atrial (LA) voltage mapping. Methods This study included 20 consecutive patients undergoing repeat ablation for recurrent atrial fibrillation who had demonstrated LA low‐voltage areas (LVAs, 0.10?mV). Following pulmonary vein isolation, LA voltage mapping was performed twice, once using the GMC and once using the CMC. Results Voltage mapping was more efficient using the GMC than the CMC in terms of mapping time (459 [404, 543] vs 602 [496, 814]?seconds; P ?=?.014) and the number of mapping points (2446 [2099, 3104] vs 1841 [1494, 2314]; P ?=?.002). The incidence of catheter‐induced ectopies was lower (44 [28, 62] vs 114 [74, 188]; P ??.0001) using the GMC. The GMC utilizing all bipoles detected LVAs in 85% of patients with LVAs detected by CMC. LVA measurements were significantly smaller on maps generated by the GMC using bipoles along or across the splines than those measured with the CMC (11.1 [4.6, 17.2] or 9.7 [2.5, 16.0] vs 16.4 [6.8, 26.8]?cm 2 ; P ?=?.008 and P ?=?.001, respectively), and were even smaller when using all bipoles (7.9 [1.1, 13.5]?cm 2 , P ?=?.0001). Conclusion The GMC allowed a more efficient mapping procedure and enabled more selective identification of LVAs with smaller LVA size.
机译:摘要介绍最近引入的电网映射导管(GMC)专为更好的电极组织接触而设计,并且可以沿着和穿过样条来收集双极信号,这可以允许更有效的电压图产生的产生与传播方向无关。我们将GMC与传统的圆形映射导管(CMC)与左心房(LA)电压映射进行比较。方法本研究包括经历过重复的心房颤动的20例连续的患者,该患者已经显示出LA低压区域(LVAS,<0.10≤mv)。在肺静脉隔离之后,一次使用GMC和一次使用CMC进行两次La电压映射。结果使用GMC比CMC在映射时间(459 [404,543] VS 602 [496,814]?秒; p?= 014)和映射点数(2446 [ 2099,3104] Vs 1841 [1494,2314]; p?= 002)。使用GMC的导管诱导的异位opecies的发生率低(44 [28,62 vs114 [74,188])。使用CMC检测到的LVA患者的85%的LVA中使用所有Bipoles检测到的GMC。在GMC使用沿与CMC测量的样条(11.1 [4.6,17.2]或9.7 [2.5,16.0] Vs 16.4 [6.8,26.8]Δcm2; p ?= 008和p?=Δ=Δ= 001),使用所有百分点时甚至更小(7.9 [1.1,13.5]Δcm2,p?0001)。结论GMC允许更有效的映射过程,并使能更具选择性识别LVA,具有较小的LVA尺寸。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号