...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology >Impact of nodal status and treatment strategy on overall survival in advanced stage cervical cancer
【24h】

Impact of nodal status and treatment strategy on overall survival in advanced stage cervical cancer

机译:节点状况和治疗策略对晚期宫颈癌整体存活的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

PurposeThe lack of prognostic data impedes implementation of optimal therapy for cervical cancer. For instance, recommended therapy for FIGO IIB cervical cancer is radical hysterectomy or radiochemotherapy. To enlighten different therapeutic approaches, we investigated the benefit of individual therapies or combination thereof in patients with or without infested lymph nodes.MethodsThe German Tumor Centre Regensburg registered 389 patients with FIGO IIB, IIIA, IIIB, and IVA cervical cancer between 2002 and 2015. We estimated hazard ratios (HR) for overall survival against different therapies using univariable and multivariable cox regression. After risk adjustment with respect to clinicopathological parameters, we performed model selection using conditional stepwise reverse selection.ResultsWe demonstrated the need for thorough assessment of the nodal status to obtain reliable data for treatment strategy. Our analysis showed significant differences for overall survival in FIGO IIB depending on therapy and nodal status. Outcome was inferior with radiochemotherapy without surgery for patients with N0 compared to surgery and radiochemotherapy combined (HR 3.012; 95% CI 1.075-8.441; p=0.036); however, for N1, radiochemotherapy without surgery resulted in comparable outcome (HR 0.808; 95% CI 0.189-3.403; p=0.765), whereas surgery alone yielded in poor outcome (HR 2.889; 95% CI 1.356-6.156; p=0.006). Regardless of the nodal status, chemotherapy was superior in advanced stage cervical cancer FIGO III to IVA.ConclusionsOur study suggests that in terms of oncological outcome FIGO IIB cervical cancer patients benefit from a combination of surgery and radiochemotherapy. However, in the presence of lymph node infestation, surgery does not add substantial benefit to the patient.
机译:目的缺乏预后数据阻碍了宫颈癌最佳治疗的实施。例如,FIGO IIB宫颈癌的推荐治疗是激进的子宫切除术或放射性化学疗法。为了开明不同的治疗方法,我们研究了在有或没有侵染淋巴结患者的单个疗法或其组合的益处。德国肿瘤中心雷根斯斯堡注册了389名Figo IIB,IIIA,IIIB和IVA宫颈癌2002年至2015年。我们估计了使用单变量和多变量的COX回归对不同疗法的整体存活的危险比率(HR)。在对临床病理参数的风险调整后,我们使用条件逐步反向选择进行了模型选择。方法证明了对节点状况的全面评估,以获得治疗策略的可靠数据。我们的分析表明,根据治疗和节点状态,FIGO IIB的整体生存差异显着。结果与N0患者的放射性化学疗法差异,与外科和放射化学疗法合并(HR 3.012; 95%CI 1.075-8.441; P = 0.036);但是,对于N1,没有手术的放射性化学疗法导致了可比的结果(HR 0.808; 95%CI 0.189-3.403; P = 0.765),而单独的手术在较差的结果中产生(HR 2.889; 95%CI 1.356-6.156; P = 0.006) 。无论节点状况如何,化疗都在晚期宫颈癌宫颈癌中优异到IVA.Conclusionsour的研究表明,在肿瘤政治结果方面,宫颈癌患者受益于手术和放射化的组合。然而,在存在淋巴结侵扰的情况下,手术对患者不增加大量益处。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号