首页> 外文期刊>Journal of cardiopulmonary rehabilitation and prevention >Participation in Physical Activity During Center and Home-Based Pulmonary Rehabilitation for People With COPD A SECONDARY ANALYSIS OF A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
【24h】

Participation in Physical Activity During Center and Home-Based Pulmonary Rehabilitation for People With COPD A SECONDARY ANALYSIS OF A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL

机译:参与中央和家庭肺部康复期间的身体活动,为受访者对随机对照试验的二级分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose: To compare levels of physical activity during center and home-based pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) in people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Methods: Forty-fi ve consecutive participants (23 male, n = 20, in the home-based group) with mean age of 68 +/- 8 yr and forced expiratory volume in the fi rst second of expiration (FEV 1) 53 +/- 18% predicted undertook physical activity monitoring using the SenseWear Armband during the fi nal week of the interventions of center or home-based PR. Differences in time spent in total physical activity (= 1.5 METs), time spent in moderate to vigorous intensity physical activity (= 3 METs), and steps were compared. Results: Home participants spent a median and interquartile range of 310 (199-328) min/ d engaged in total physical activity (29% moderate to vigorous intensity physical activity) compared with 300 (204-370) min/ d for the center group (28% moderate to vigorous intensity physical activity, P =.98). Daily step count did not differ between groups (home-based median 5232 [2067-7718] versus center-based median 4049 [1983-6040], P =.66). Of note, center-based participants took 38% more steps on days of program attendance compared with nonattendance days (mean difference: 761 steps/ d; 95% CI, -56 to 1579, P =.06). Conclusion: For people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease undertaking PR, no differences in physical activity levels between center and home-based programs were demonstrated. Understanding the impact of the indirect supervision and motivational interviewing technique utilized during home-based PR on levels of physical activity in people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease may support clinical implementation of the model as an alternative option to traditional care.
机译:目的:在慢性阻塞性肺疾病中,比较中心和家庭肺部康复(PR)的身体活动水平。方法:四十五连续参与者(23男,N = 20,在家庭群体中),平均年龄为68 +/- 8,到期秒(FEV 1)53 +强制呼气量(FEV 1)53 + / - 在中心或基于家庭的PR的干预措施期间,预测使用Senswear Arm带进行体力活动监测。在总物理活动(= 1.5 MET)中花费的时间差异,比较了中等至剧烈强度体力活动(= 3 MET)的时间和步骤。结果:家庭参与者花了中位数和四分位于310(199-328)Min / D的中位数,与300(204-370)Min / D为中心集团的300(204-370)分钟(28%适中到剧烈的强度身体活动,p = .98)。每日步骤数在组之间没有区别(基于家庭中位数5232 [2067-7718]与中心的中位数4049 [1983-6040],p = .66)。值得注意的是,与非判处日期(平均差异:761个步骤/ d; 95%CI,-56至1579,P = .06),以课程出勤时间迈出了38%的节目考勤时间结论:对患有慢性阻塞性肺病的人进行PR,对中心和家庭课程之间的身体活动水平没有差异。了解在基于家庭的PR期间使用的间接监督和励磁面试技术对慢性阻塞性肺病的人们身体活动水平的影响可能支持该模型的临床实施作为传统护理的替代方案。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号