...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Alzheimer's disease: JAD >The Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Version of Confusion Assessment Method Based Scoring System for Delirium Severity (CAM-S)
【24h】

The Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Version of Confusion Assessment Method Based Scoring System for Delirium Severity (CAM-S)

机译:基于谵妄(CAM-S)的基于混淆评估方法的中文版的可靠性和有效性(CAM-S)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Previous studies showed that the Confusion Assessment Method based delirium severity evaluation tool (CAM-S) had good reliability and validity. However, there is no Chinese version of the CAM-S. Therefore, we set out to perform a prospective investigation in older Chinese patients who had total joint replacement surgery under general anesthesia in Tenth People's Hospital in Shanghai, P.R. China. A total of 576 participants, aged 60 years or older, were screened, 179 participants were enrolled, and 125 of them were included for the final analysis. Pre-operative evaluations were conducted one day before the surgery. Postoperative evaluations were conducted twice daily from postoperative day 1 to day 3. The incidence of postoperative delirium was 24.8%. The Chinese version of CAM-S [including a Short Form (CAM-S Short Form) and a Long Form (CAM-S Long Form)] had an optimal reliability reflected by internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.748 and 0.839 for CAM-S Short Form and CAM-S Long Form respectively), split-halves reliability (Pearson correlation coefficient = 0.372 and 0.384 for CAM-S Short Form and CAM-S Long Form respectively), and inter-rater reliability (intra-class correlation coefficients = 0.629 and 0.945 for CAM-S Short Form and CAM-S Long Form respectively). Additionally, the Chinese version of CAM-S also showed a good discriminate validity. The domain scores of CAM-S were inversely correlated with corresponding domain scores of the MMSE. Finally, a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis obtained an optimal cutoff point of 2.5 for CAM-S Short Form and 3.5 for CAM-S Long Form in recognizing delirium diagnosed by CAM. The areas under the ROC were 0.989 (95% CI 0.972 - 1.000, p < 0.001) and 0.964 (95% CI 0.946 - 0.982, p < 0.001), respectively. These data suggest that the Chinese version of CAM-S has good reliability and validity in evaluating postoperative delirium in geriatric Chinese patients and may be a useful tool to assess the severity of delirium.
机译:以前的研究表明,基于混乱评估方法的谵妄严重性评估工具(CAM-S)具有良好的可靠性和有效性。但是,没有中文版的CAM-S。因此,我们旨在在上海的第十人医院的全身麻醉下,对患有全共关节置换手术的较老患者进行前瞻性调查。共有576岁或以上的参与者,筛选,注册了179名参与者,其中125名已被列入最终分析。在手术前一天进行术前评估。术后第1天从术后第3天每天进行术后评估。术后谵妄的发生率为24.8%。 CAM-S的中文版[包括短型(CAM-S短型)和长形式(CAM-S长形)]具有由内部一致性反映的最佳可靠性(Cronbach的alpha = 0.748和0.839用于CAM-S.短的形式和CAM-S的长形状分别),分别的可靠性(Pearson相关系数= 0.372和0.384分别用于CAM-S的短型和CAM-S长格式)和帧间的可靠性(帧内相关系数=为CAM-S短型和CAM-S长格式0.629和0.945)。此外,中文版的CAM-S还显示出良好的鉴别有效性。 CAM-S的域分数与MMSE的相应域分数相反。最后,接收器操作特性(ROC)分析获得了2.5的最佳截止点,用于CAM-S短型和3.5,用于识别由凸轮诊断的谵妄。 ROC下的区域分别为0.989(95%CI 0.972-1.000,P <0.001)和0.964(95%CI 0.946-0.982,P <0.001)。这些数据表明,中国版的CAM-S具有良好的可靠性和有效性,在老年患者的术后谵妄中具有良好的可靠性和有效性,并且可能是评估谵妄严重程度的有用工具。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号