...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of bronchology & interventional pulmonology >A Randomized Controlled Trial on Optimal Sampling Sequence in Radial Guide Sheath Endobronchial Ultrasound Lung Biopsy
【24h】

A Randomized Controlled Trial on Optimal Sampling Sequence in Radial Guide Sheath Endobronchial Ultrasound Lung Biopsy

机译:径向引导鞘内鞘内超声肺活检中最优采样序列的随机对照试验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: An optimal sampling sequence in radial guide sheath endobronchial ultrasound lung biopsy (R-EBUS) is unclear. This prospective single-center pilot randomized controlled trial aimed to determine if the initial method and sequence of sampling affect the diagnostic accuracy of the procedure. Methods: Consecutive patients undergoing R-EBUS for lesions >15 mm with a bronchus sign were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to biopsy first (group A), brushings first (group B) or combination (group C). The primary outcome was a positive diagnosis from any sampling method. Results: Fifty-four patients were randomized. The overall diagnostic yield of the procedure was 77.8% (95% confidence interval: 66%-89%), with no difference between groups. A higher rate of positive cytology from brushings was seen if the biopsies were performed before brushings (77.8% in group A vs. 44.4% in group B,P=0.03). The rate of positive cytology from washings was higher if the washings were obtained just after the brushings (61.1% in group A vs. 11.1% in group B,P=0.02). There was no difference in the rate of positive biopsy histology in the groups (P=0.27). All 3 sampling modalities were more likely to be positive in group A (50.0% vs. 11.1% in group B and 22.2% in group C,P=0.04). Complications rate was low and not significantly different between groups. Conclusion: The overall rate of a positive R-EBUS procedure was not affected by the initial sampling method or sequence. However, all 3 sampling modalities were more likely to be positive if biopsies were performed first, followed by brushings and washings.
机译:背景:径向引导鞘中的最佳采样序列在鞘内鞘内肺活检(R-EBUS)中尚不清楚。该潜在的单中心试点随机对照试验旨在确定初始方法和采样序列是否会影响程序的诊断准确性。方法:随机分配(1:1:1),对活检(第a组),首先(B)或组合(组C)组合(组C)组合(组C)组合(组C)组合(组C),随机分配(1:1:1),将15毫米进行抗损伤> 15mm患者。主要结果是任何取样方法的阳性诊断。结果:五十四名患者随机。该程序的整体诊断产量为77.8%(95%置信区间:66%-89%),组之间没有差异。如果在刷子之前进行活组织检查(在B组,P = 0.03组,P = 0.03,P = 0.03,P = 0.03,P = 0.03,P = 0.03,P = 0.03,P = 0.03)中,则可以看到从刷胶中较高的抗刷子阳性细胞学率。如果在刷子之后获得的洗涤液(在B组,B组,P = 0.02,P = 0.02,P = 0.02,P = 0.02,P = 0.02,P = 0.02,P = 0.02,P = 0.02)阳性清晰度,则呈阳性细胞学的速率越高。在组中阳性活检组织学的速率没有差异(p = 0.27)。所有3种样品型均可在A组(B组中50.0%对11.1%的50.0%,C组中22.2%,P = 0.04)。并发症率低,组之间不显着差异。结论:阳性R-EBUS程序的总体速率不受初始采样方法或序列的影响。然而,如果首先进行活组织检查,则所有3个采样方式更可能是阳性的,然后用刷胶和洗涤。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号