...
【24h】

A new experimental adhesive system containing G-IEMA - physicochemical properties

机译:含有G-IEMA的新型实验粘合剂系统 - 物理化学性质

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The ultimate goal of this study was the development of a new Bis-GMA-free dental adhesive system with improved adhesive properties. Instead of Bis-GMA, a dendritic macromer (G-IEMA), derived from 2-isocyanatoethyl methacrylate (IEMA), was used and its physicochemical properties were investigated. G-IEMA was synthesized and subsequently incorporated into an experimental adhesive (AE2) formulated without Bis-GMA. Double bond conversion (DBC), polymerization shrinkage (PS), water sorption (WS) and solubility (SL) were evaluated and results were compared with three other adhesives: - an experimental adhesive formulated with Bis-GMA (AE1); Scotchbond (SBU); and, Futurabond M+ (FUT). Comparisons between adhesives for DBC, PS, WS and SL properties were performed using One-Way ANOVA and the Kruskal-Wallis test, at the 5% significance level. Statistical analysis of DBC data, using one-way ANOVA, revealed significant differences between adhesives (p < .001). AE2 presented a significantly higher DBC than SBU (p < .001) and FUT (p = .004); no significant differences were observed between AE2 and AE1 (p = .403) with 60s of light-curing. Kruskal-Wallis test revealed no significant differences between adhesives (p = .094) for PS. One-Way ANOVA showed no significant differences among adhesives for WS (p = .213) and SL (p = .175). Inconclusion,G-IEMA-based adhesive AE2 presented comparable DBC, PS, WS and SL when compared to Bis-GMA-based adhesive AE1. The results obtained so far are promising, revealing that G-IEMA macromer might be a good substitute monomer to prepare Bis-GMA-free adhesive systems.
机译:本研究的最终目标是开发新的BIS-GMA无牙科粘合剂系统,具有改善的粘合性能。使用衍生自2-异氰基乙酯(IEMA)的树突式大分子(G-IEMA)而不是BIS-GMA,并研究其物理化学性质。合成G-IEMA并随后掺入没有BIS-GMA的实验粘合剂(AE2)中。评价双键转化(DBC),聚合收缩(PS),水吸附(WS)和溶解度(SL),与三种其他粘合剂进行比较结果: - 用双-GMA(AE1)配制的实验粘合剂; Scotchbond(SBU);而且,Futurabond M +(Fut)。使用单向ANOVA和Kruskal-Wallis试验在5%显着性水平下进行DBC,PS,WS和SL性质的粘合剂之间的比较。使用单向ANOVA的DBC数据的统计分析显示粘合剂之间的显着差异(P <.001)。 AE2呈现比SBU(P <.001)和FUT(P = .004)呈现出明显更高的DBC; AE2和AE1(p = .403)之间没有显着差异,具有60多次光固化。 Kruskal-Wallis测试显示PS的粘合剂(p = .094)之间没有显着差异。单向ANOVA在WS的粘合剂中没有显着差异(p = .213)和sl(p = .175)。与基于BIS-GMA的粘合剂AE1相比,呈递基于G-IEMA的粘合剂AE2呈现了类似的DBC,PS,WS和SL。到目前为止获得的结果是有前途的,揭示G-IEMA大分子物可能是制备无BIS-GMA的粘合体系的良好替代单体。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号