首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Biomechanics >A comparison of acromion marker cluster calibration methods for estimating scapular kinematics during upper extremity ergometry
【24h】

A comparison of acromion marker cluster calibration methods for estimating scapular kinematics during upper extremity ergometry

机译:副肢体测力仪估计肩胛上的肩谱标记簇校准方法的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Accurate measurement of joint kinematics is required to understand the musculoskeletal effects of a therapeutic intervention such as upper extremity (UE) ergometry. Traditional surface-based motion capture is effective for quantifying humerothoracic motion, but scapular kinematics are challenging to obtain. Methods for estimating scapular kinematics include the widely-reported acromion marker cluster (AMC) which utilizes a static calibration between the scapula and the AMC to estimate the orientation of the scapula during motion. Previous literature demonstrates that including additional calibration positions throughout the motion improves AMC accuracy for single plane motions; however this approach has not been assessed for the non-planar shoulder complex motion occurring during UE ergometry. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of single, dual, and multiple AMC calibration methods during UE ergometry. The orientations of the UE segments of 13 healthy subjects were recorded with motion capture. Scapular landmarks were palpated at eight evenly-spaced static positions around the 360 degrees cycle. The single AMC method utilized one static calibration position to estimate scapular kinematics for the entire cycle, while the dual and multiple AMC methods used two and four static calibration positions, respectively. Scapulothoracic angles estimated by the three AMC methods were compared with scapulothoracic angles determined by palpation. The multiple AMC method produced the smallest RMS errors and was not significantly different from palpation about any axis. We recommend the multiple AMC method as a practical and accurate way to estimate scapular kinematics during UE ergometry. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:需要精确测量关节运动学,以了解治疗干预的肌肉骨骼效果,例如上肢(UE)的钻石。传统的基于地表的运动捕获对于量化肱自动化运动是有效的,但肩胛上的运动学是挑战的。估计肩胛上运动学的方法包括广泛报告的acraomion标记簇(AMC),其利用肩胛骨和AMC之间的静态校准来估计运动期间肩胛骨的取向。以前的文献表明,在整个运动中包括额外的校准位置可以提高单个平面运动的AMC精度;然而,这种方法尚未评估在UE中测定中发生的非平面肩部复杂运动。本研究的目的是评估UE Er测压期间单一,双AMC和多AMC校准方法的准确性。用运动捕获记录13个健康受试者的UE区段的取向。在360度循环周围的八个均匀间隔的静态位置触摸肩胛骨标志。单个AMC方法利用一个静态校准位置来估计整个循环的肩胛上,而双和多个AMC方法分别使用两个和四个静态校准位置。将三种AMC方法估计的浮雕角度与通过触诊确定的肌肉植物角度进行比较。多AMC方法产生了最小的RMS误差,并且与任何轴的触诊没有显着不同。我们建议多种AMC方法作为估计UE中测定仪稀疏运动学的实用和准确的方法。 (c)2016 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号