首页> 外文期刊>Drug Metabolism and Disposition: The Biological Fate of Chemicals >Do In Vitro Assays Predict Drug Candidate Idiosyncratic Drug-Induced Liver Injury Risk?
【24h】

Do In Vitro Assays Predict Drug Candidate Idiosyncratic Drug-Induced Liver Injury Risk?

机译:体外测定预测药物候选药物诱导的肝损伤风险吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In vitro assays are commonly used during drug discovery to try to decrease the risk of idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury (iDILI). But how effective are they at predicting risk? One of the most widely used methods evaluates cell cytotoxicity. Cytotoxicity assays that used cell lines that are very different from normal hepatocytes, and high concentrations of drug, were not very accurate at predicting idiosyncratic drug reaction risk. Even cytotoxicity assays that use more biologically normal cells resulted in many false-positive and false-negative results. Assays that quantify reactive metabolite formation, mitochondrial injury, and bile salt export pump (BSEP) inhibition have also been described. Although evidence suggests that reactive metabolite formation and BSEP inhibition can play a role in the mechanism of iDILI, these assays are not very accurate at predicting risk. In contrast, inhibition of the mitochondrial electron transport chain appears not to play an important role in the mechanism of iDILI, although other types of mitochondrial injury may do so. It is likely that there are many additional mechanisms by which drugs can cause iDILI. However, simply measuring more parameters is unlikely to provide better predictive assays unless those parameters are actually involved in the mechanism of iDILI. Hence, a better mechanistic understanding of iDILI is required; however, mechanistic studies of iDILI are very difficult. There is substantive evidence that most iDILI is immune mediated; therefore, the most accurate assays may involve those that determine immune responses to drugs. New methods to manipulate immune tolerance may greatly facilitate development of more suitable methods.
机译:在药物发现期间通常使用体外测定以试图降低特质药物诱导的肝损伤的风险(念草)。但它们在预测风险时如何有效?其中一种最广泛的方法之一评估细胞细胞毒性。细胞毒性测定,使用与正常肝细胞的细胞系具有非常不同的细胞系,以及高浓度的药物,在预测特质药物反应风险方面并不非常准确。甚至使用更多生物学正常细胞的细胞毒性测定导致许多假阳性和假阴性结果。还描述了量化反应性代谢物形成,线粒体损伤和胆汁盐出口泵(BSEP)抑制的测定。虽然证据表明反应性代谢物形成和BSEP抑制可以在偶然的机制中发挥作用,但这些测定在预测风险时不是非常准确。相反,抑制线粒体电子传输链的抑制作用在念珠菌机制中不起作用重要作用,尽管其他类型的线粒体损伤可能会这样做。有许多额外的机制可以使药物引起愚蠢。然而,只需测量更多参数即不可能提供更好的预测测定,除非这些参数实际上是idili的机制。因此,需要更好地理解偶然的理解;然而,偶然的机械研究非常困难。有实质性证据表明大多数念石免疫介导;因此,最准确的测定可能涉及那些确定对药物免疫反应的测定。操纵免疫耐受的新方法可能极大地促进更合适的方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号