首页> 外文期刊>Journal of bodywork and movement therapies >Osteopathic manual therapy in heart failure patients: A randomized clinical trial
【24h】

Osteopathic manual therapy in heart failure patients: A randomized clinical trial

机译:心力衰竭患者的骨质疗法疗法:随机临床试验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

BackgroundHeart Failure (HF) patients usually present with increased arterial resistance and reduced blood pressure (BP) leading to an impaired functional capacity. Osteopathic Manual Therapy (OMT) focused on myofascial release techniques (MRT) and in the balancing of diaphragmatic tensions, has been shown to improve blood flow in individuals using the resistive index (RI). However, its effects in HF patients have not been examined. PurposeTo evaluate the acute response of selected osteopathic techniques on RI, heart rate (HR), and BP in patients with HF. MethodsRandomized-controlled clinical trial of HF patients assigned to MRT (six different techniques with three aimed at the pelvis, two at the thorax, and one at the neck for 15?min) or Control group (subjects in supine position for 15?min without intervention). The RI of the femoral, brachial and carotid arteries was measured via doppler ultrasound while HR and BP were measured via sphygmomanometry before and after a single MRT or control intervention. ResultsTwenty-two HF patients equally distributed (50% male, mean age 53 years; range 32–69 years) (ejection fraction?=?35.6%, VO2peak: 12.9?mL/kg?1min?1) were evaluated. We found no intra or inter group differences in RI of the carotid (ΔMRT: 0.07% vs ΔControl:11.8%), brachial (ΔMRT:0.17% vs ΔControl: 2.9%), or femoral arteries (ΔMRT:1.65% vs ΔControl: 0.97%) (P?>?0.05) and no difference in HR or BP (ΔMRT:0.6% vs ΔControl: 3%), (P?>?0.05). ConclusionA single MRT session did not significantly change the RI, HR, or BP of HF patients.
机译:Backgroundheart失败(HF)患者通常存在增加的动脉抗性和降低血压(BP),导致功能容量受损。骨质疗法手工治疗(OMT)专注于肌菌释放技术(MRT)和膈肌张力的平衡,已经证明使用电阻指数(RI)改善个体中的血流。然而,它在HF患者中的影响尚未被检查。 purposeto评估了HF患者RI,心率(HR)和BP的选定骨疗法技术的急性反应。方法对分配给MRT的HF患者的临床临床试验(六种不同的技术,三种针对胸部的胸部,两个在胸部,颈部颈部15?min)或对照组(在仰卧位的受试者15?min。干涉)。通过多普勒超声测量股骨,臂肌和颈动脉的Ri,同时通过单个MRT或控制干预之前和之后通过血压计测量HR和BP。结果平等分布的患者(男性50%,平均53岁;范围32-69岁)(喷射分数?= 35.6%,VO2Peak:12.9?ml / kg?1min?1)。我们发现颈动脉的rI内或间基间差异(ΔMRT:0.07%VsΔConscrolol:11.8%),肱(ΔMRT:0.17%VsΔConscontrol:2.9%)或股骨动脉(ΔMRT:1.65%VsΔControl:0.97 %)(p?> 0.05),HR或Bp没有差异(ΔMRT:0.6%VsδControl:3%),(P?>?0.05)。结论单一MRT会议没有显着改变HF患者的RI,HR或BP。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号