...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Agriculture,Food Systems,and Community Development >Growing our own: Characterizing food production strategies with five U.S. community-based food justice organizations
【24h】

Growing our own: Characterizing food production strategies with five U.S. community-based food justice organizations

机译:生长我们自己的:用五个美国的粮食司法组织表征食品生产策略

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Community-based organizations (CBOs) leading the U.S. food justice movement have helped expand community food production. Understanding the nature of this work is one key to being able to more effectively support and expand it. The literature, however, contains little scholarly work characterizing production-related practices of food justice CBOs. To help fill that gap, this paper draws from participatory action research with five CBOs to identify and characterize their community food production activities and goals.This research was conducted over five years, during a project called Food Dignity, using three main methods: digital storytelling; collaborative pathway modeling; and conventional case study methods that included interviews, participation and observation, and document analysis. These datasets were examined to identify what production activities the CBOs support and why they undertake them.Results suggest that the CBOs invest in community food production in eight main ways. Five are directly related to food. Listed roughly in decreasing order of intensity and frequency of the activities, these are (1) growing vegetables and fruits, (2) supporting community gardens, (3) supporting individual gardeners, (4) supporting local farmers, and (5) fostering other kinds of food production. Additionally, three crosscutting strategies underpin all the CBOs' work, including community food production:(6) connecting people and organizations, (7) promoting community foodsystems, and (8) integrating their activities with community (as opposed to food) at the center. The CBOs' goals for these activities are transformational, including achieving community-led and sustainable food security, health, and economic equity.The CBOs' crosscutting activities and long-term goals point to supporting and assessing outcomes that include food production and access but are also nonfood related, such as leadership development and feelings of belonging or ownership. Their wide rangeof food production activities and social change goals need more support for expansion, trial and error, documentation, and assessment. In particular, intentionally supporting food justice CBOs in their crosscutting strategies, which are foundational andyet less visible and underfunded, may multiply the range and reach of their impacts.
机译:基于社区的组织(CBO)领导美国粮食司法运动有助于扩大社区粮食生产。了解这项工作的性质是能够更有效地支持和扩展它的一个关键。然而,文献包含了对食品司法CBO的生产相关实践的小学术工作。为了帮助填补这种差距,从参与式行动研究中借鉴了五个CBO,以识别和表征他们的社区粮食生产活动和目标。这项研究是多年来五年,在一个名为食品尊严的项目中,使用三种主要方法:数字讲故事;协同途径建模;以及包括访谈,参与和观察和文件分析的传统案例研究方法。审查了这些数据集以确定CBOS支持以及为什么他们承诺的生产活动。结果表明,CBO以八种主要方式投资社区粮食生产。五个与食物直接相关。粗略地列出了活动的强度和频率的顺序,这些是(1)种植蔬菜和水果,(2)支持社区花园,(3)支持个人园丁,(4)支持当地农民,(5)培养其他人各种食品生产。此外,三个横切策略支持所有CBO的工作,包括社区粮食生产:(6)联系人员和组织,(7)促进社区食品系统,并在中心将其与社区(与食物相对的食物相结合) 。这些活动的CBOS的目标是变革,包括实现社区主导和可持续的粮食安全,健康和经济公平。CBOS的横切活动和长期目标指向支持和评估包括粮食生产和访问的结果也是非食物相关的,如领导力发展和归属或所有权的感受。粮食生产活动和社会变更目标的广泛系列需要更多支持扩展,试验和错误,文档和评估。特别是,在其横切策略中有意地支持食品司法CBO,这些策略是较小的可见和欠缺的基础,可以乘以其影响的范围和达到。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号