...
首页> 外文期刊>The journal of asthma >Asthma control in London secondary school children
【24h】

Asthma control in London secondary school children

机译:伦敦中学儿童的哮喘控制

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Objective: The asthma control test (ACT) is a validated tool for assessing control in asthmatic children aged 12 years and older. Using the ACT, we sought to assess asthma control and knowledge in London secondary school children. Methods: Secondary schools in London, UK, participated in this study. Children with doctor-diagnosed asthma were invited to complete an online questionnaire that included the ACT and questions about asthma. Suboptimal asthma control was defined as an ACT score of = 19 out of a maximum score of 25. Data are summarised as median and interquartile range (IQR), and were analysed by either Mann-Whitney test, or chi-square test. A p value of 0.05 was considered significant. Results: A total of 799 children completed the questionnaire; 689 (86.2%) were included for analysis. Suboptimal asthma control was reported by 49.6% of students. Over a third (42.4%) of students prescribed a short-acting beta 2-agonist inhaler felt uncomfortable using it at school, and 29.2% (n = 173) reported not using this inhaler when wheezy. 56.4% (n = 220) of those with regular inhaled corticosteroids did not take them as prescribed, and 41.7% did not know what this inhaler was for. Suboptimal control was associated with a greater proportion of students reporting that they were 'somewhat', 'hardly' or 'not at all' comfortable using inhalers at school (52.7% vs 29.1%, p 0.01) and outside school (22.8% vs. 14.8%, p 0.01). Conclusions: Suboptimal asthma control and poor asthma knowledge are common in London schoolchildren.
机译:目的:哮喘控制试验(ACT)是用于评估12岁及以上哮喘儿童控制的验证工具。使用该法案,我们试图评估伦敦中学儿童的哮喘控制和知识。方法:英国伦敦中学,参加了这项研究。邀请有医生诊断的哮喘的儿童填写一个包含关于哮喘的行为和问题的在线问卷。次优哮喘控制被定义为最大得分的动作得分为25分。数据被总结为中位数和间隙范围(IQR),并通过Mann-Whitney检验或Chi-Square测试分析。 p值& 0.05被认为是显着的。结果:共有799名儿童完成问卷; 689(86.2%)被列入分析。 49.6%的学生报告了次优哮喘控制。超过三分之一(42.4%)的学生规定了一名短作用Beta 2-Angonist吸入器,在学校使用它感到不舒服,29.2%(n = 173)报告说,当喘息时没有使用这种吸入器。 56.4%(n = 220)那些常规吸入皮质类固醇的那些没有按规定服用,41.7%不知道这个吸入器是什么。次优控制与更大比例的学生报告称,他们在学校使用吸入器(52.7%vs 29.1%,P& 0.01)和外部学校(22.8%与14.8%,p <0.01)。结论:诸如哮喘控制和贫困哮喘知识在伦敦学童中很常见。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号