...
首页> 外文期刊>The journal of asthma >Missed opportunities to transition from nebulizers to inhalers during hospitalization for acute asthma: A multicenter observational study
【24h】

Missed opportunities to transition from nebulizers to inhalers during hospitalization for acute asthma: A multicenter observational study

机译:在急性哮喘住院期间,错过了从雾化器过渡到吸入器的机会:多中心的观察研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Objective: Hospitalizations for acute asthma are thought to be highly preventable through the use of efficacious medications, though many patients have poor metered-dose inhaler (MDI) techniques, thus lessening these medications' real-world effectiveness. Teaching MDI techniques during hospitalization may therefore lead to improved outcomes. However, MDIs may be underutilized to deliver short-acting β-agonists (SABAs) in the inpatient setting, despite equivalent efficacy to nebulizer delivery. We sought to characterize delivery methods of SABAs among hospitalized patients with acute asthma to understand if there are missed opportunities for self-management education. Methods: In this secondary analysis of a cross-sectional 25-center chart review study of children and adults (ages 2–54 years) hospitalized for acute asthma across 18 states (2012–2013), we studied SABA therapy delivery methods during hospitalization and receipt of action plans and follow-up visits. Unadjusted associations were analyzed using chi-square, Fisher's exact, or Kruskal–Wallis tests. Measurements and main results: Of 987 patients, 44% received only nebulizer-SABA (children 32% vs. adults 53%; p < 0.001) during hospitalization, and 55% (children 68% vs. adults 47%; p < 0.001) received any MDI-SABA during hospitalization. Children receiving only nebulizer- vs. MDI-SABA were significantly less likely to receive individualized action plans (p < 0.001). Compared to children, adults were overall less likely to receive written plans (47% vs. 78%, p < 0.001) or to have a follow-up appointment (38% vs. 59%, p < 0.001) at discharge. Conclusions: Opportunities exist to increase the delivery of MDI-SABA during hospitalization, particularly for adult inpatients with asthma. Further studies are needed to determine if increased use of MDI-delivered therapies improves patient education and outcomes. ? 2017 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.
机译:目的:通过使用有效的药物,虽然许多患者具有差的计量剂量吸入器(MDI)技术,但急性哮喘的住院都被认为是高度可预防的,因此减少了这些药物的真实效力。因此,在住院期间教学MDI技术可能导致改善的结果。然而,尽管对雾化器递送等同的功效,但MDI可以冷冻于在本体定位中递送短效β-激动剂(SABAS)。我们试图在住院患者中表征SABA的递送方法,以了解自我管理教育的机会是否错过了急性哮喘。方法:在截至18个州的急性哮喘住院(2012-2013)的儿童和成年人(年龄2-54岁)的横断面图25中心图审查研究中,我们研究了住院期间的SABA治疗递送方法收到行动计划和后续访问。使用Chi-Square,Fisher的确切或Kruskal-Wallis测试分析了未经调整的关联。测量和主要结果:987例患者,44%仅接受雾化器-Saba(32%与成人32%的儿童53%; P <0.001),55%(儿童68%与成年人47%; P <0.001)在住院期间收到任何MDI-SABA。仅接受雾化器与MDI-SABA的儿童显着不太可能收到个性化行动计划(P <0.001)。与儿童相比,成年人的总体上不太可能收到书面计划(47%vs.78%,P <0.001)或在出院时进行后续预约(38%vs.59%,P <0.001)。结论:存在在住院期间增加MDI-SABA的机会,特别是对于具有哮喘的成人住院患者。需要进一步的研究来确定是否增加了MDI递送的疗法的使用,从而改善了患者教育和结果。还2017年泰勒&弗朗西斯集团,LLC。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号