...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of atmospheric and solar-terrestrial physics >A global assessment of ray-traced and blind tropospheric models in the retrieval of tropospheric parameters from ground-based GPS observations
【24h】

A global assessment of ray-traced and blind tropospheric models in the retrieval of tropospheric parameters from ground-based GPS observations

机译:基于地面GPS观测的对流层参数检索的光线跟踪和盲目地文模型的全球评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The number of ground-based GNSS reference stations has increased significantly in recent years, which provides very favorable conditions for ZTD/ZWD retrieval. The methods of estimating ZTD/ZWD based on three a-priori troposphere values are discussed using GNSS reference stations without meteorological equipments. GPS observation data for two weeks in different seasons from 22 global IGS stations were processed using online GAPS software with static and kinematic PPP mode based on ECMWF grid product and GPT2.1w/UNB3m blind tropospheric models. Vienna Mapping Function 1 (VMF1) is used for all the a-priori models. The numerical results show that: compared with the IGS ZTD products, mm-level and about 2 cm-level ZTD products can be obtained based on the three a-priori troposphere values using static PPP and kinematic PPP respectively. About 1 cm-level and 2 cm-level ZWD products can be obtained based on ECMWF grid product/GPT2.1w model using static PPP and kinematic PPP respectively. The discrepancy between the LID estimates based on the three a priori troposphere values is no more than 3 mm, and the differences of the averaged ZTD Mbias, RMSE and Std of the 22 IGS stations based on the three a-priori troposphere values are no more than 0.3 mm. While there is obvious differences in ZWD estimates based on the three a-priori troposphere values. The differences of the averaged ZWD Mbias/RMSE between ECMWF grid product and GPT2.1w model is about 0.2 cm, and the differences of the averaged ZWD Mbias/RMSE between ECMWF grid product and UNB3m model are about 0.5-1 cm. There is a systematic bias of about +/- 1 cm between the ZWD estimates based on GPT2.1w and UNB3m. This study shows that GNSS PPP technology based on ECMWF grid product and blind tropospheric model has great potential for ZTD/ZWD retrieval using ground-based GNSS reference stations.
机译:近年来,基于地基GNSS​​参考站的数量显着增加,为ZTD / ZWD检索提供了非常有利的条件。使用GNSS参考站讨论了基于三个A-Priortio对流层值的估计ZTD / ZWD的方法,没有气象设备。 GPS观察数据在22个全球IGS站的不同季节的不同季节使用在线差距软件以及基于ECMWF网格产品的静态和运动PPP模式和GPT2.1W / UNB3M盲目的对流层模型进行处理。维也纳映射功能1(VMF1)用于所有A-Priori型号。数值结果表明:与IGS ZTD产品相比,可以分别使用静态PPP和运动PPP基于三个a-priorioTioPpp基于三个a-priori的对流层值获得mm级和约2cm级ZTD产品。通过分别使用静态PPP和运动PPP,可以基于ECMWF网格产品/ GPT2.1W模型获得约1cm级和2cm级ZWD产品。基于三个先验的对流层值的盖估计之间的差异不超过3mm,并且基于三个a-priorio蒸层值的平均Ztd Mbias,Rmse和STD的差异不再是超过0.3毫米。虽然基于三个a-priorio的对流层值存在明显的ZWD估计差异。 ECMWF电网产品和GPT2.1W模型之间平均ZWD MBIAS / RMSE的差异约为0.2cm,ECMWF网格产品和UNB3M型号之间平均ZWD MBIAS / RMSE的差异约为0.5-1cm。基于GPT2.1W和UNB3M的ZWD估计之间存在约+/- 1厘米的系统偏差。本研究表明,基于ECMWF电网产品和盲目对流层模型的GNSS PPP技术具有使用基于地GNSS参考站的ZTD / ZWD检索的巨大潜力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号