...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Applied Remote Sensing >Method for delineating open water bodies based on the deeply clear waterbody delineation index
【24h】

Method for delineating open water bodies based on the deeply clear waterbody delineation index

机译:基于深度清澈的水体描绘指数描绘开放水体的方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Land surface water is one of the most vital resources on Earth for human survival, and it is necessary to distinguish water bodies from nonwater features. Remote sensing techniques are among the most widely used approaches for monitoring water resources; many waterbody delineation methods have been proposed, and multiband spectral water indices are among the most popular. These methods utilize blue, green, near-infrared (NIR), middle-infrared, and shortwave infrared bands but do not involve the red band. A waterbody delineation index is introduced, i.e., the deeply clear waterbody delineation index (DCWDI), which is based on the reflectance of the red and NIR bands. In NIR-red spectral space, the distance between deeply clear water pixels and the coordinate origin, O, is less than that of other land cover types. This method can use the distance between any point E and the coordinate origin O to differentiate deeply clear water pixels from nonwater pixels, i.e., objects near point O are always deeply clear water bodies or extremely wet regions. The accuracy and robustness of the DCWDI are tested using Landsat 8 operational land imager images of Hongjiannao Lake, Qinghaihu Lake, and Lingao Reservoir. The performance of the DCWDI is compared with that of the normalized difference water index (NDWI), automated water extraction index (AWEI), and the modified NDWI (MNDWI). The net shoreline movement (NSM) and the area errors between delineated water areas and the "true" areas of water bodies are adopted to evaluate the accuracies of the four classifiers. The mean vertical bar NSM vertical bar values from the DCWDI of Hongjiannao Lake, Qinghaihu Lake, and Lingao Reservoir are 17.033, 75.108, and 11.021 m, respectively, which are smaller than those from the MNDWI (34.641, 149.308, and 19.647 m), NDWI (71.607, 164.503, and 22.151 m), and AWEInsh (19.957, 113.119, and 11.126 m). The average of vertical bar NSM vertical bar and area error from the DCWDI are smaller than those from the other three classifiers. These results show that the lake boundaries derived from the DCWDI are spatially similar to the "true" lake boundaries, and the DCWDI, which is obtained from NIR-red spectral space, can be applied to delineate and detect the changes in information on deeply clear water. The spatial location information contained within NSM can validate the accuracy of a classifiers' ability to extract water bodies. (C) 2019 Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE)
机译:陆地水域是人类生存中最重要的资源之一,有必要将水体与非水别特征区分开。遥感技术是最广泛使用的监测水资源的方法之一;已经提出了许多水体描绘方法,并且多频光谱水指数是最受欢迎的。这些方法利用蓝色,绿色,近红外(NIR),中红外线和短波红外频带,但不涉及红色频段。介绍了水体描绘指数,即深度清澈的水体描绘指数(DCWDI),其基于红色和NIR带的反射率。在NIR - 红色光谱空间中,深度清晰的水像素与坐标原点的距离,o小于其他陆地覆盖类型的距离。该方法可以使用任何点E和坐标原点O之间的距离来区分从非水像素的深度清晰的水像素,即,点O附近的物体始终深刻的水体或极其潮湿的区域。 DCWDI的准确性和稳健性使用Landsat 8运营陆地成像仪图像进行了测试的洪剑湖,青海湖和幽州水库。将DCWDI的性能与标准化差异水指数(NDWI),自动化水提取指数(AWEI)的性能进行比较,以及修改的NDWI(MNDWI)。采用净海岸线运动(NSM)和划清水域和“真实”区域之间的区域误差来评估四分类器的准确性。来自洪建华湖,青海湖和幽州水库的DCWDI的平均垂直条标值分别是17.033,75.108和11.021米,小于MNDWI(34.641,149.308和19.647米), NDWI(71.607,164.503和22.151米)和AWEINSH(19.957,113.119和11.126米)。 DCWDI的垂直杆NSM垂直条和区域误差的平均值小于来自其他三个分类器的平均值。这些结果表明,来自DCWDI的Lake边界在空间上类似于“真正的”湖边边界,并且从NIR-RED光谱空间获得的DCWDI可以应用于描绘并检测深度清晰的信息的变化水。 NSM中包含的空间位置信息可以验证分类器提取水体的能力的准确性。 (c)2019年光学仪表工程师协会(SPIE)

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号