首页> 外文期刊>Journal of aging and health >Prevalence and Risk Factors of Frailty in a Community-Dwelling Population: The HELIAD Study
【24h】

Prevalence and Risk Factors of Frailty in a Community-Dwelling Population: The HELIAD Study

机译:社区住宅人口脆弱患病率和危险因素:Heliad研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Objective: To estimate the prevalence of frailty using five different instruments in a cohort of older adults and explore the association between frailty and various risk factors. Method: 1,867 participants aged 65 years and above were included in the current retrospective cross-sectional study. Frailty was operationalized according to the Fried definition, the FRAIL Scale, the Frailty Index (FI), the Tilburg Frailty Indicator (TFI), and the Groningen Frailty Index (GFI). We explored the role of various frailty risk factors using logistic regression analyses. Results: The prevalence of frailty varied depending on the definition used (Fried definition = 4.1%, FRAIL Scale = 1.5%, FI = 19.7%, TFI = 24.5%, and GFI = 30.2%). The only risk factors consistently associated with frailty irrespectively of definition were education and age. Conclusion: The frailty prevalence reported in our study is similar or lower to that reported in other population studies. Qualitative differences between frailty definitions were observed.
机译:目的:估算使用五种不同仪器在老年人队列中使用五种不同仪器的患病率,探索脆弱与各种风险因素之间的关联。方法:目前的回顾性横截面研究包括1,867名65岁及以上的参与者。脆弱的是根据油炸的定义,虚线,脆弱指数(FI),Tilburg Freirty指标(TFI)以及Groningen Freirty指数(GFI)进行运作。我们探讨了使用Logistic回归分析的各种脆弱危险因素的作用。结果:根据所用定义的脆弱性变化(油炸定义= 4.1%,虚缩量级= 1.5%,Fi = 19.7%,TFI = 24.5%,GFI = 30.2%)。与定义无关持续脆弱的唯一风险因素是教育和年龄。结论:我们研究中报告的毛细胞患病率类似于或降低到其他人口研究中。观察到脆弱定义之间的定性差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号