首页> 外文期刊>Journal of AOAC International >Comparison of QuEChERS with Traditional Sample Preparation Methods in the Determination of Multiclass Pesticides in Soil
【24h】

Comparison of QuEChERS with Traditional Sample Preparation Methods in the Determination of Multiclass Pesticides in Soil

机译:Quechers与传统样品制备方法的比较在土壤中测定多纤维农药

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Background: The increased use of pesticides leads to permanent pollution of soil, and there is a need for continuous monitoring of these agrochemicals in soil. Objective: Three methods for the simultaneous determination of 12 pesticides belonging to eight chemical groups in soil samples were tested and compared based on analytical parameters. Methods: The quick, easy, cheap, effective, rugged, and safe (QuEChERS); traditional solid-liquid extraction (SLE); and Soxhlet extraction were used for soil sample preparation, while detection and quantification of pesticides were performed using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). Results: The tested methods featured good sensitivity, and with the exception for carbofuran (Soxhlet method, LOD = 29 mu g/kg), for the rest of the pesticides, the studied LODs were less than 12 mu g/kg. Except for simazine and carbofuran, LODs obtained by Soxhlet extraction were lower than values obtained by other two methods, whereas QuEChERS gave lower LODs than the traditional SLE method for all compounds except atrazine and acetochlor. The recoveries obtained applying QuEChERS, traditional SLE, and Soxhlet methods for multiple analyses of soil samples fortified at 10,75, and 200 mu g/kg of each pesticide were in the ranges 54-103,40-91, and 12-92%, respectively. Except for chlorothalonil, the highest recoveries were obtained by the QuEChERS method. Soxhlet was better than traditional SLE method for chlorothalonil, heptachlor, and aldrin; organophosphorus pesticides (fenitrothion and diazinon) and trifluralin, gave similar recoveries for both methods. All three methods were proven to be repeatable, with RSDs lower than 19%. Conclusions: Although all tested methods showed as satisfactory regarding most analytical parameters, QuEChERS method showed much better results in terms of confidence, indicating that traditional SLE and Soxhlet extraction still need improvements for determination of multiclass pesticides in soil samples.
机译:背景:杀虫剂的使用增加导致土壤永久性污染,并且需要连续监测土壤中这些农业化学物质。目的:基于分析参数,测试了三种同时测定属于土壤样品中的八种化学基团的农药的三种方法。方法:快速,简便,便宜,有效,崎岖,安全(Quechers);传统的固液萃取(SLE);使用Soxhlet萃取用于土样制剂,同时使用气相色谱 - 质谱(GC-MS)进行杀虫剂的检测和定量。结果:测试方法具有良好的敏感性,并且对于尸体呋喃(Soxhlet方法,LOD =29μg/ kg),对于其他农药而言,研究的LOD小于12μg/ kg。除了Simazine和Carbofuran,通过Soxhlet提取获得的床位低于通过其他两种方法获得的值,而Quechers比除尿嘧啶和乙酰物除外的所有化合物的传统SLE方法都会产生较低的腰层。将QueCher,传统SLE和Soxhlet方法获得的回收率用于10,75和200μg/ kg各农药的土壤样品进行多次分析,均为54-103,40-91,12-92% , 分别。除氯洛尼洛尼洛尼亚外,通过Quechers方法获得的最高回收率。 Soxhlet优于传统的SLOPIL,Heptachlor和Aldrin;有机磷杀虫剂(Fenitrohion和Diazinon)和Trifluralin,两种方法都具有相似的回收率。证明所有三种方法都被证明是可重复的,RSD低于19%。结论:尽管对大多数分析参数的所有测试方法表现出令人满意,但是QueChers方法在信心方面表现出更好的结果,表明传统的SLE和Soxhlet提取仍然需要改进土壤样品中的多种多组农药。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号