首页> 外文期刊>Journal of applied biobehavioral research >The Comprehensive Muscular Activity Profile(CMAP): Its Clinical Utility in ObjectivelyDifferentiating Between Low Back PainPatients and Normals
【24h】

The Comprehensive Muscular Activity Profile(CMAP): Its Clinical Utility in ObjectivelyDifferentiating Between Low Back PainPatients and Normals

机译:综合肌肉活动概况(CMAP):其临床效用在客观上提高低腰部减少治疗和法线

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Earlier findings demonstrated that the comprehensive muscular activity profile (CMAP) system was a powerful clinical method for evaluating lumbar range of motion (ROM) and lifting capacity (LC) while also documenting participant effort. A subsequent study also reported the CMAP's clinical utility for patients with musculoskeletal pain claims. Building upon these studies, the present investigation evaluated the CMAP's ability to reliably differentiate between healthy individuals versus those with low back pain (LBP). Twenty LBP patients and 20 demographically matched healthy subjects were adminis-tered the CMAP protocol (measuring ROM and LC). For ROM, there were no signifi-cant differences between the groups for overall performance and for degree of effort. However, for the LC, there were significant differences between groups: the LBP patients displayed lower performance relative to normals. Results demonstrate the clinical utility of the CMAP for the objective quantification of functional differences between the two groups.
机译:早期的研究结果表明,综合肌肉活动简介(CMAP)系统是评估腰部运动(ROM)和提升能力(LC)的强大临床方法,同时还记录参与者努力。随后的研究还报告了CMAP患者肌肉骨骼疼痛患者的临床效用。在这些研究时,本研究评估了CMAP在健康个体与背部疼痛(LBP)之间相比的能力。 20磅患者和20个人口统计匹配的健康受试者是管理CMAP协议(测量ROM和LC)。对于ROM,集团之间没有显着的差异,用于整体性能和努力程度。然而,对于LC,组之间存在显着差异:LBP患者相对于法线的性能降低。结果证明了CMAP的临床效用,用于客观定量两组之间的功能差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号