首页> 外文期刊>World Development >Forest commons, vertical integration and smallholder's saving and investment responses: Evidence from a quasi-experiment
【24h】

Forest commons, vertical integration and smallholder's saving and investment responses: Evidence from a quasi-experiment

机译:森林公共,垂直整合和小农的储蓄和投资回应:来自准实验的证据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

As the result of prohibitively high transaction costs, smallholder farmers are only partly integrated into agricultural and forest commodity markets, a situation that may leave them in a lower level of development equilibrium (i.e., a poverty trap). For the most part, many users of forest commons extract forest products, typically non-timber products, for subsistence use or safety net purposes. To overcome this problem, in recent years, collective vertical integration (VI) of forest product marketing cooperative structures have been promoted and, in some cases, adopted by users of forest commons. Although this type of program has been observed to raise smallholder incomes, there is little evidence available on saving/investment responses to such income gains. This paper investigates precautionary saving and investment responses to collective forest product marketing programs among users of forest commons in Ethiopian villages. To identify the causal effects of the program, I applied propensity score matching, difference-in-difference (DID) and change-in-change (CIC) estimators to household survey data collected from randomly selected households in the Gimbo district (south-western Ethiopia). I find strong evidence that participation in the program reduces savings in the form of livestock holdings and that effect is limited to non-poor households. When interpreted in terms of the Permanent Income Hypothesis (PIH), the results imply that participants felt the current income gains to be non-transient, which led to reduced precautionary savings and to a gain in consumption/welfare. Moreover, I found that the program has spurred investment in child education and participation in off-farm self-employment. These results point to the importance of the safety net/insurance channel of the program. Overall, the findings underscore the program's potential to raise the standard of living via ancillary mechanisms beyond directly raising income outcome. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:由于承诺高的交易成本,小农农民仅部分融入农业和森林商品市场,这一情况可能将其留在较低水平的发展均衡(即,贫困陷阱)中。在大多数情况下,许多森林公共用户的用户提取林产品,通常是非木材产品,用于生存或安全网目的。为了克服这个问题,近年来,森林产品营销合作结构的集体垂直整合(vi)被促进,在某些情况下,由森林公共用户通过。虽然已经观察到这种类型的程序来提高小农收入,但很少有证据可以节省/投资对此类收益的响应。本文调查了埃塞俄比亚村民森林公共汽车用户的集体森林产品营销计划的预防性节省和投资回应。为了确定程序的因果效果,我应用倾向得分匹配,差异差异(DIC)和变更(CIC)估计到Gimbo区的随机选择的家庭收集的家庭调查数据(西南部)埃塞俄比亚)。我发现有权参与该计划的证据减少了牲畜控股形式的节省,效果仅限于非贫困家庭。当在常规收入假设(PIH)方面解释时,结果意味着参与者认为目前的收入增益是非瞬态的,导致预防性储蓄和消费/福利的收益。此外,我发现该计划刺激了儿童教育和参与农业自营职业的投资。这些结果指出了该计划的安全网/保险渠道的重要性。总的来说,调查结果强调了该计划的潜力,通过辅助机制提高生活水平,超出直接筹集收入结果。 (c)2020 elestvier有限公司保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号