首页> 外文期刊>World Development >Paper Works: Contested Resource Histories in Peru's Huascaran National Park
【24h】

Paper Works: Contested Resource Histories in Peru's Huascaran National Park

机译:纸作品:秘鲁Huascaran国家公园的有争议的资源历史

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Resource histories determine how particular parts of the environment come to be defined as valuable. As elsewhere, protected areas in Latin America link the governance of people, territory, and resources by reinterpreting and reclassifying practices and environments. Set in highland Peru, the article focuses on how such revisions imply contestation of both history and future. It explores particular modes of claiming space through an archeology of the claims to knowledge and legitimacy put forward by a national park and a campesino community, respectively. Claims to space entwine with social struggles about local development where territorial claims are based on different notions of history and interpretations of the esthetic and productive values of the landscape. While the park officials navigate interests of conservation, tourism, and extraction, the campesino community mobilizes a different set of values and interests based on their historical occupation of the territories. These processes of contestation over authority and legitimacy highlight different views on the role of landscapes in the history and progress of local communities. Conservation may not only dispossess people of their land and natural resources, but also of labor and territorial sovereignty. This case shows how an Andean campesino community counters such movements by a wide repertoire of legal and social actions that works simultaneously in legal and extra-legal domains. Paper works mediate claims to territorial sovereignty, people, and resources. These claims involve contestations over interpretations of history which, besides their oral forms, materialize in paperwork such as official communications, community records, and cadastral maps, as well as in visual representations, internal statutes, and deliberate history writing. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:资源历史决定了环境的特定部分如何定义为有价值。与其他地方一样,拉丁美洲的受保护区通过重新解读和重新分类实践和环境来将人民,领土和资源的治理联系起来。该文章在高地秘鲁举办了,重点介绍,这些修订如何意味着历史和未来的争论。它通过向国家公园和坎佩诺社区提出的知识和合法性的声称,探讨了许可证空间的特定模式。索赔与社会斗争的空间纠缠在地方发展,领土声称基于历史的不同概念和景观的美学和生产价值的解释。虽然公园官员导航保护,旅游业和提取的利益,但坎佩诺社区根据其历史占领的历史占领,调动一些不同的价值观和兴趣。这些争议的过程和权威和合法性的过程突出了对景观在当地社区历史和进步的不同看法。保护可能不仅可以剥夺其土地和自然资源的人,也可以劳动和领土主权。本案展示Andean Campesino社区如何通过在法律和额外的法律领域同时起作用的法律和社会行为的广泛曲目。纸作业向领土主权,人员和资源调解索赔。这些索赔涉及对历史解释的争论,除了他们的口头形式,除了官方通信,社区记录和地籍地图等文书工作中,以及视觉陈述,内部法规和故意历史写作等文书工作。 (c)2017 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号