首页> 外文期刊>World Development >Is there any chance for the poor to cope with extreme environmental events? Two case studies in the Solomon Islands
【24h】

Is there any chance for the poor to cope with extreme environmental events? Two case studies in the Solomon Islands

机译:穷人是否有可能应对极端的环境事件? 所罗门群岛的两项案例研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Our paper analyses the patterns and factors that explain households' responses to extreme environmental events (EEEs) in two case studies of indigenous communities in the Solomon Islands. We used the ethnographic approach to describe the case studies and carried out thematic analysis to disentangle the factors that explain such responses. The first case was that of a rural community from Ranogha Island in the Western Province that was hit by the Tsunami of April 2007; the second was of a community settled in an informal development on a flood-prone area in peri-urban Honiara that was hit by a flash flood in April 2014. Drawing from the villagers' experiences, we found that aid and support from family and community, referred to by the respondents as the "wantok" system, was key to recovering from the disasters. Many respondents identified climate change as one leading factor that explained such catastrophic events. The social cooperation system, the government's role in responding to catastrophes and household net worth were identified among the main components of household responses. These constitute an effective engine to build palliative and preventive responses against catastrophic events and climate change risks. In spite of the extreme poverty observed, and the lack of government assistance, we conclude that amenities obtained from the community (through the wantok system) and household net worth (including the availability of common pool resources) enabled them to cope with the catastrophes. These factors are critical for long-term adaptation to EEEs and climate change risks. The community responses analysed with thematic analysis showed to be consistent with the conceptualization led by a farm-household model, and the household net worth as a source of income appears to be the correct measure of wealth instead the level of income in these less monetarised communities. Learning from how these communities and households responded to such EEEs provides evidence on how other communities could successfully adapt to increasing climate change risks. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:我们的论文分析了解释家庭对极端环境事件(EEES)的模式和因素,在Solomon群岛的土着社区的两种案例中。我们利用民族志的方法来描述案例研究,并进行了专题分析,解除解释这些反应的因素。第一个案例是,来自西部省的Ranogha岛的农村社区,由2007年4月的海啸袭击;第二个是一个社区在2014年4月的普里城市霍尼亚拉的洪水普通地区的一个非正式发展中,我们发现村民的经验,我们发现家庭和社区的援助和支持被受访者称为“WASTOK”系统,是从灾难中恢复的关键。许多受访者认为气候变化为解释这种灾难性事件的一个主要因素。社会合作制度,政府在回应灾难和家庭净值方面的作用是在家庭反应的主要成分中确定的。这些构成了一个有效的发动机,以建立对灾难性事件和气候变化风险的姑息性和预防措施。尽管观察到极端贫困和缺乏政府援助,但我们得出结论,从社区(通过WASTOK系统)和家庭净值(包括公共池资源的可用性)获得的设施使他们能够应对灾难。这些因素对于长期适应对eeps和气候变化风险至关重要。通过专题分析分析的社区反应显示,与农场家庭模型的概念化,作为收入来源的家庭净值似乎是财富的正确衡量标准,而是这些不那么货币社区中的收入水平。学习这些社区和家庭如何应对这些eEES提供了有关其他社区如何成功适应气候变化风险的证据。 (c)2019年elestvier有限公司保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号