首页> 外文期刊>JAMA neurology >Effect of Pain Neuroscience Education Combined With Cognition-Targeted Motor Control Training on Chronic Spinal PainA Randomized Clinical Trial
【24h】

Effect of Pain Neuroscience Education Combined With Cognition-Targeted Motor Control Training on Chronic Spinal PainA Randomized Clinical Trial

机译:疼痛神经科学教育结合认知靶向运动控制训练对慢性脊髓急性临床试验的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Importance ? Effective treatments for chronic spinal pain are essential to reduce the related high personal and socioeconomic costs. Objective ? To compare pain neuroscience education combined with cognition-targeted motor control training with current best-evidence physiotherapy for reducing pain and improving functionality, gray matter morphologic features, and pain cognitions in individuals with chronic spinal pain. Design, Setting, and Participants ? Multicenter randomized clinical trial conducted from January 1, 2014, to January 30, 2017, among 120 patients with chronic nonspecific spinal pain in 2 outpatient hospitals with follow-up at 3, 6, and 12 months. Interventions ? Participants were randomized into an experimental group (combined pain neuroscience education and cognition-targeted motor control training) and a control group (combining education on back and neck pain and general exercise therapy). Main Outcomes and Measures ? Primary outcomes were pain (pressure pain thresholds, numeric rating scale, and central sensitization inventory) and function (pain disability index and mental health and physical health). Results ? There were 22 men and 38 women in the experimental group (mean [SD] age, 39.9 [12.0] years) and 25 men and 35 women in the control group (mean [SD] age, 40.5 [12.9] years). Participants in the experimental group experienced reduced pain (small to medium effect sizes): higher pressure pain thresholds at primary test site at 3 months (estimated marginal [EM] mean, 0.971; 95% CI, –0.028 to 1.970) and reduced central sensitization inventory scores at 6 months (EM mean, –5.684; 95% CI, –10.589 to –0.780) and 12 months (EM mean, –6.053; 95% CI, –10.781 to –1.324). They also experienced improved function (small to medium effect sizes): significant and clinically relevant reduction of disability at 3 months (EM mean, –5.113; 95% CI, –9.994 to –0.232), 6 months (EM mean, –6.351; 95% CI, –11.153 to –1.550), and 12 months (EM mean, –5.779; 95% CI, –10.340 to –1.217); better mental health at 6 months (EM mean, 36.496; 95% CI, 7.998-64.995); and better physical health at 3 months (EM mean, 39.263; 95% CI, 9.644-66.882), 6 months (EM mean, 53.007; 95% CI, 23.805-82.209), and 12 months (EM mean, 32.208; 95% CI, 2.402-62.014). Conclusions and Relevance ? Pain neuroscience education combined with cognition-targeted motor control training appears to be more effective than current best-evidence physiotherapy for improving pain, symptoms of central sensitization, disability, mental and physical functioning, and pain cognitions in individuals with chronic spinal pain. Significant clinical improvements without detectable changes in brain gray matter morphologic features calls into question the relevance of brain gray matter alterations in this population. Trial Registration ? clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT02098005.
机译:重要性?慢性脊柱疼痛的有效治疗对于减少相关的高个人和社会经济成本至关重要。客观的 ?比较止痛神经科学教育结合认知目标电机控制培训,利用当前的最佳证据理疗,用于减少疼痛和改善功能,灰质形态特征,患有慢性脊柱疼痛的个体的疼痛认知。设计,设置和参与者?多中心随机临床试验从2014年1月1日,2017年1月30日,在20名慢性非特异性脊柱疼痛中,在2名门诊医院的慢性非特异性脊柱患者中,3,6和12个月的后续行动。干预措施?参与者被随机分为实验组(结合止痛性神经科学教育和认知目标电机控制训练)和对照组(结合后颈部疼痛和一般运动疗法)。主要成果和措施?主要结果是疼痛(压力疼痛阈值,数值评级规模和中央致敏库存)和功能(疼痛残疾指数和心理健康和身体健康)。结果 ?实验组中有22名男性和38名女性(意思是[SD]年龄,39.9 [12.0岁)和25名男性和35名男性和35名女性在对照组(意思是[SD]年龄,40.5 [12.9]年)。实验组的参与者经历了减少的疼痛(小于中等效果大小):3个月的初级试验部位的较高压力疼痛阈值(估计边际[EM]平均值,0.971; 95%CI,-0.028至1.970)和中央敏感性降低6个月的库存分数(EM平均值,-5.684; 95%CI,-10.589至-0.780)和12个月(EM平均值,-6.053; 95%CI,-10.781至-1.324)。它们还经历了改进的功能(小于中等效果大小):3个月内显着且临床相关的残疾减少(EM平均值,-5.113; 95%CI,-9.994至-0.232),6个月(EM平均值,-6.351; 95%CI,-11.153至-1.550)和12个月(EM平均值,-5.779; 95%CI,-10.340至-1.217); 6个月的精神健康状况更好(EM平均值,36.496; 95%CI,7.998-64.995); 3个月(EM平均值,39.263; 95%CI,9.644-66.882),6个月(EM平均值,53.007; 95%CI,23.805-82.209)和12个月(EM为12个月(EM为12个月(EM平均值。 CI,2.402-62.014)。结论和相关性?止痛神经科学教育与认知目标电机控制训练相结合似乎比目前最佳的最佳物理治疗更有效,从而改善疼痛,中央致敏,残疾,心理和身体作用的疼痛,患有慢性脊柱疼痛的个体疼痛认知。没有明显的临床改进而没有脑灰质形态学特征的可检测变化的问题呼吁质疑脑灰质改变在这群人群中的相关性。试用登记? ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT02098005。

著录项

  • 来源
    《JAMA neurology》 |2018年第7期|共10页
  • 作者单位

    Research Foundation–Flanders Brussels Belgium;

    Pain in Motion International Research Group Brussels Belgium;

    Pain in Motion International Research Group Brussels Belgium;

    Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences;

    Pain in Motion International Research Group Brussels Belgium;

    Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences;

    Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences;

    Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences;

    Department of Physiotherapy Human Physiology and Anatomy Faculty of Physical Education and;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 神经病学与精神病学;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-20 08:31:53

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号