首页> 外文期刊>JACC. Cardiovascular interventions >Association Between Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory Pre-Activation and Reperfusion Timing Metrics and Outcomes in Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
【24h】

Association Between Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory Pre-Activation and Reperfusion Timing Metrics and Outcomes in Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

机译:心脏导管型实验室前激活和再灌注正时测定的患者心脏导管术前激活和再灌注正时测定术中初前经皮冠状动脉介入的患者

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to describe the prevalence of pre-hospital cardiac catheterization laboratory activation and its association with reperfusion timeliness and in-hospital mortality. BackgroundFor patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction diagnosed in the field, catheterization laboratory pre-activation may lead to more timely reperfusion and improved outcomes. MethodsA total of 27,840 patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction transported via emergency medical services to 744 percutaneous coronary intervention–capable hospitals in the ACTION Registry from January 2015 to March 2017 were evaluated, excluding patients with cardiac arrest or requiring pre–percutaneous coronary intervention intubation. Catheterization laboratory pre-activation was defined as activation >10 min prior to hospital arrival. ResultsCatheterization laboratory pre-activation occurred in 41% of patients (n?= 11,379), with minor presenting differences between those with and without catheterization laboratory pre-activation. Compared with no catheterization laboratory pre-activation, pre-activation patients were more likely to be directly transported to the catheterization laboratory on hospital arrival (23.3% vs. 5.3%), to have shorter hospital arrival–to–catheterization laboratory arrival time (median 17 min [interquartile range (IQR): 7 to 25 min] vs. 28 min [IQR: 18 to 39 min]), to have shorter door-to-device time (40 min [IQR: 30 to 51 min] vs. 52 min [IQR: 41 to 65 min]), and to have a greater likelihood of achieving first medical contact–to–device time?≤90 min (76.6% vs. 68.6%) (p?< 0.001 for all). Pre-activation was associated with lower in-hospital mortality (2.8% vs. 3.4%; p?= 0.01). Patients treated at hospitals in the lowest tertile of pre-activation rates had higher mortality than those treated at hospitals in the highest tertile before and after adjustment (3.6% vs. 2.7%; adjusted odds ratio: 1.33; 95% confidence interval: 1.08 to 1.63). ConclusionsIn the United States, catheterization laboratory pre-activation occurred in fewer than one-half of emergency medical services–transported patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Its association with faster reperfusion and lower mortality supports greater use of this strategy.
机译:本研究的客观目的是描述医院前心导管插入实验室激活的患病率及其与再灌注及时性和住院死亡率的关联。对于在该领域诊断出的ST段升高心肌梗死的患者,导尿实验室预活化可能导致更及时再灌注和改善的结果。 MethaSA总共27,840名患者通过紧急医疗服务运输至2017年1月至2017年3月的行动登记处的744名患有444名经皮冠状动脉干预的医院的27,840名患者进行了评估,不包括心脏骤停的患者或需要预生殖冠状动脉干预插管。导尿实验室预活化被定义为在医院到来之前的活化> 10分钟。结果发生器化实验室预活化发生在41%的患者(N?= 11,379)中发生,患有和没有导尿实验室预激活之间的次要呈现。与无导管插入实验室预活化相比,预活化患者更有可能直接运输到医院到达的导尿实验室(23.3%与5.3%),较短的医院到达 - 导尿实验室到达时间(中位数17分钟[四分位数范围(IQR):7至25分钟] Vs. 28分钟[IQR:18至39分钟]),具有较短的门对设备时间(40分钟[IQR:30至51分钟] Vs. 52分钟[IQR:41至65分钟]),并且具有更大的可能性来实现第一医学接触到装置时间?≤90分钟(76.6%对68.6%)(P?<0.001)。预活化与较低的院内死亡率有关(2.8%对3.4%; P?= 0.01)。在医院的最低激活率的医院治疗的患者的死亡率高于在调整前后的最高型号的医院治疗的死亡率(3.6%与2.7%;调整后的赔率比:1.33; 95%置信区间:1.08至1.63)。结论美国,导尿实验室预激活发生在较少于一半的紧急医疗服务运输患者的ST段抬高心肌梗死。其与更快的再灌注和降低死亡率的关联支持更多地利用这种策略。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号