...
首页> 外文期刊>Drug and alcohol dependence >Factors associated with an evidence-based measure of implementation for the Adolescent Community Reinforcement Approach
【24h】

Factors associated with an evidence-based measure of implementation for the Adolescent Community Reinforcement Approach

机译:与基于证据的循证措施的衡量因素,以对青少年社区强化方法的实施

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Highlights ? Dataset represents 76 treatment organizations, 351 clinicians, and 8,869 clients. ? Found correlates and predictors of an evidence-based measure of implementation. ? Treatment initiation rate and session exposure predicted A-CRA procedure exposure. ? Treatment initiation rate and session exposure may warrant higher prioritization. Abstract Background An evidence-based measure of implementation (EBMI) is an implementation outcome measure shown to have predictive validity with one or more future-measured constructs of importance. The current study sought to identify correlates and predictors of an EBMI called procedure exposure. Garner et al. (2016) found procedure exposure to be an EBMI for the Adolescent Community Reinforcement Approach (A-CRA). Methods The dataset included 76 community-based substance use treatment organizations located across the United States. Organizational-level regression analyses, which were framed within the context of Chaudoir et al. (2013) framework for predicting implementation outcomes, were used to examine predictors of A-CRA procedure exposure Results The Washington Circle’s treatment initiation performance measure (B=5.05 [SE=1.60], p =0.002), as well as session exposure (B=0.18 [ SE =0.06], p =0.003), were significant predictors of A-CRA procedure exposure in the backward stepwise regression analysis (Adjusted R-square=0.55). The Washington Circle’s treatment engagement performance measure (B=7.93 [ SE =0.77], p SE =0.02], p =0.02), each had significant bivariate relationships with A-CRA procedure exposure but were not retained in the final model. Conclusions Organizations implementing A-CRA are encouraged to make the following high priorities: (a) scheduling and completing a subsequent treatment session within 14days of their index session (treatment initiation) and (b) providing a targeted number of treatment sessions to each client (session exposure). To the extent organizations do this, they may be more likely to achieve higher levels of A-CRA procedure exposure.
机译:强调 ? DataSet代表76个治疗机构,351名临床医生和8,869名客户。还找到了基于证据的实施衡量标准的相关性和预测因子。还治疗起始率和会话暴露预测A-CR过程暴露。还治疗起始率和会议暴露可能需要更高的优先级。摘要背景下的基于证据(EBMI)的措施目前的研究试图识别称为程序暴露的EBMI的相关性和预测因子。 Garner等人。 (2016年)发现手术暴露为青少年社区强化方法(A-CRA)的EBMI。方法数据集包括76个基于社区的物质使用,位于美国。组织级回归分析,在Chaudoir等人的背景下陷入困境。 (2013)用于预测实施结果的框架,用于检查A-CR过程的预测因素曝光结果华盛顿圈的治疗开始性能测量(B = 5.05 [SE = 1.60],P = 0.002),以及会议曝光(B = 0.18 [SE = 0.06],P = 0.003),在后阶逐步回归分析中是A-CRA程序暴露的显着预测因子(调节的R-Square = 0.55)。华盛顿圈的治疗接合性能测量(B = 7.93 [SE = 0.77],P SE = 0.02),P = 0.02),每个都具有与A-CRA程序暴露的显着的双变量关系,但未在最终模型中保留。结论鼓励实施A-CRA的组织使以下高度优先事项:(a)在其指数(治疗启动)和(b)的14天内安排和完成后续治疗会议,向每个客户提供有针对性的治疗课程数量(会议曝光)。在某个方面,组织这样做,它们可能更有可能实现更高水平的A-CRA程序暴露。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号