首页> 外文期刊>Digestive endoscopy: official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society >Inhibitory effect of lidocaine on colonic spasm during colonoscopy: A multicenter double‐blind, randomized controlled trial
【24h】

Inhibitory effect of lidocaine on colonic spasm during colonoscopy: A multicenter double‐blind, randomized controlled trial

机译:利多卡因在结肠镜检查过程中LIDOCAIN对结肠痉挛的抑制作用:多中心双盲,随机对照试验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objectives Colonic spasm can interfere with colonoscopy, but antispasmodic agents can cause complications. This study aimed to assess the inhibitory effect of topical lidocaine compared with a placebo control. Methods In five tertiary‐care hospitals in Japan, 128 patients requiring endoscopic resection of a colorectal lesion were enrolled and randomly and double‐blindly allocated to colonoscopy with topical administration of 2% lidocaine solution 20mL ( LID , n ?=?64) or normal saline 20mL (control, n ?=?64). During colonoscopy, the assigned solution was applied with a spray catheter near the lesion and the area was observed for three minutes. primary endpoint was the inhibitory effect at three time‐points (1, 2 and 3 minutes after dispersion), using a three‐point scale (excellent, fair, poor). Secondary endpoints were rebound spasm and adverse events. All endpoints were scored in real time. Serum lidocaine levels were measured in 32 patients ( LID 16, control 16). Results There were no significant differences between groups in patient demographics. At all time‐points, the proportion of patients with “excellent” scores was greater in LID group than control group, with significant differences observed at 2 minutes ( p ?=?0.02) and 3 minutes ( p ?=?0.02). In LID group, the rate of “excellent” scores increased by 12.5% at 2 minutes and was maintained at 3 minutes. Rebound spasm did not occur in LID group, compared with 15.6% of control group ( p ?=?0.001). There were no adverse events in LID group. All serum lidocaine levels were below detectable levels. Conclusions Topical lidocaine is an effective and safe method for suppressing colorectal spasm during colonoscopy ( UMIN 000024733).
机译:目标结肠痉挛可以干扰结肠镜检查,但抗痉挛剂会导致并发症。本研究旨在评估局部利多卡因与安慰剂对照的抑制作用。在日本五个三级护理医院的方法,128名需要内镜切除结直肠病变的患者进行了注册,随机分配给结肠镜检查,局部施用2%利多卡因溶液20ml(盖子,n?= 64)或正常盐水20ml(控制,n?=?64)。在结肠镜检查期间,将分配的溶液用损伤附近的喷雾导管施用,观察到该区域3分钟。主要终点是三个时间点的抑制作用(分散后的1,2和3分钟),使用三点刻度(优异,公平,差)。次要终点是反弹痉挛和不良事件。所有终点都是实时得分的。在32例患者(盖子16,对照16)中测量血清利多卡因水平。结果患者人口统计数据之间没有显着差异。在所有时间点,盖组患者比对照组更大的患者比例大于对照组,在2分钟内观察到显着差异(p?= 0.02)和3分钟(p?= 0.02)。在盖子组中,“优异”分数的速度在2分钟内增加12.5%,并在3分钟内保持。盖子组中的反弹痉挛不会发生,而15.6%的对照组(p?= 0.001)。盖子集团没有不良事件。所有血清利多卡因水平低于可检测水平。结论局部利用是一种有效和安全的方法,用于在结肠镜检查期间抑制结肠直肠痉挛(UMIN 000024733)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号