...
首页> 外文期刊>Digestive Diseases and Sciences >Comparison of Point-of-Care and Classical Immunoassays for the Monitoring Infliximab and Antibodies Against Infliximab in IBD
【24h】

Comparison of Point-of-Care and Classical Immunoassays for the Monitoring Infliximab and Antibodies Against Infliximab in IBD

机译:对IBD中英夫利昔单抗和抗体抗体监测的护理点和经典免疫测定的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

ObjectiveThe primary objective is to assess whether the POC assays to measure infliximab residual trough level in the serum of IBD patients were non-inferior to the ELISA techniques available on the market, and to determine which of them was the most robust. The second is to compare three different ELISA kits for monitoring anti-infliximab antibodies (ATI).MethodsThe assays were carried out on patients' sera using four ELISA kits from four different suppliers (three with a monoclonal antibody and one polyclonal) and two rapid techniques provided by BuHLMANN (Quantum Blue((R))) and R-Biopharm (Ridaquick) for monitoring infliximab levels. ATI were measured by three ELISA sets (Grifols, Theradiag, and R-Biopharm) which have different positivity limits and different units.ResultsWe measured infliximab residual level and ATI in the serum of 90 IBD patients (85 treated with infliximab and five with adalimumab). All of the infliximab assays were very well correlated when analyzed with Spearman nonparametric correlation (0.93r0.99), and the two POC assays were also excellently correlated (r=0.98). The ATI monitoring kits revealed a correlation ranging from 0.73 to 0.96 when comparing positive and negative patients. When normalizing the quantitative values between the different ELISA tests (expressed arbitrarily by using multiples of the positivity limits defined by each supplier), the Spearman r coefficient ranged from 0.81 to 0.93.ConclusionThe available evidence allows us to conclude that all of the infliximab monitoring assays correlate well and may be used for IFX monitoring; albeit variations in measured IFX concentration among different assays remain present, these assays could be interchangeable. The ATI monitoring techniques are all capable of detecting ATI-positive patients, but because of the difference in the positivity limits and the measurement units, it is better to follow a patient rate with one definite kit.
机译:客观的主要目标是评估患有IBD患者的血清中血清血压残留槽水平的POC测定是否非逊色于市场上可用的ELISA技术,并确定其中哪一个是最强大的。第二种是比较三种不同的ELISA试剂盒用于监测抗痘痘抗体(ATI)。使用来自四种不同供应商的四个ELISA试剂盒(三种具有单克隆抗体和一种多克隆)和两种快速技术,对患者的血清进行测定。由Buhlmann(Quantum Blue((R)))和R-Biopharm(Ridaquick)提供,用于监测英夫利昔单抗水平。用三个ELISA套(Grifols,Theradiag和R-Biopharm)测量,它具有不同的阳性限制和不同的单位。培养血清测量的90例IBD患者血清中的血压血管剩余水平和ATI(用英夫利昔单抗治疗,用Adalimalab治疗) 。当用Spearman非参数相关(0.93R0.99)分析时,所有英肾上腺素的测定都非常好,并且两个POC测定也有很好的相关性(r = 0.98)。 ATI监测套件显示相比阳性和阴性患者的0.73至0.96的相关性。当归一化不同的ELISA测试之间的定量值(通过使用由每个供应商定义的阳性限制的倍数任意表示)时,Spearman R系数范围为0.81至0.93.结论可用证据使我们能够得出结论,所有英夫利昔单抗监测测定相关性,可用于IFX监测;在不同的测定中测量的IFX浓度的变化仍然存在,这些测定可以是可互换的。 ATI监测技术全部能够检测到ATI阳性患者,但由于积极限制和测量单元的差异,最好遵循一个明确的套件的患者率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号