首页> 外文期刊>Disability and rehabilitation. >Rasch analysis of the Chedoke-McMaster Attitudes towards Children with Handicaps scale
【24h】

Rasch analysis of the Chedoke-McMaster Attitudes towards Children with Handicaps scale

机译:CHEDOKE-MCMASTER对障碍尺度儿童态度的Rasch分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Aim To assess whether the Chedoke-McMaster Attitudes towards Children with Handicaps (CATCH) 36-item total scale and subscales fit the unidimensional Rasch model. Method The CATCH was administered to 1881 children, aged 7-16 years in a cross-sectional survey. Data were used from a random sample of 416 for the initial Rasch analysis. The analysis was performed on the 36-item scale and then separately for each subscale. The analysis explored fit to the Rasch model in terms of overall scale fit, individual item fit, item response categories, and unidimensionality. Item bias for gender and school level was also assessed. Revised scales were then tested on an independent second random sample of 415 children. Results Analyses indicated that the 36-item overall scale was not unidimensional and did not fit the Rasch model. Two scales of affective attitudes and behavioural intention were retained after four items were removed from each due to misfit to the Rasch model. Additionally, the scaling was improved when the two most negative response categories were aggregated. There was no item bias by gender or school level on the revised scales. Items assessing cognitive attitudes did not fit the Rasch model and had low internal consistency as a scale. Conclusion Affective attitudes and behavioural intention CATCH sub-scales should be treated separately. Caution should be exercised when using the cognitive subscale.
机译:旨在评估Chedoke-McMaster态度对带有障碍物的儿童(捕获)36项总尺度和分量器符合非二维Rasch模型。方法捕获到1881名儿童,在横断面调查中举起7-16岁。用于初始RASCH分析的随机样本中使用的数据为416。对36项刻度进行分析,然后单独执行每个子级。分析探讨了在整体尺度适合,单独的项目拟合,项目响应类别和单向性方面适合RASCH模型。还评估了性别和学校一级的物品偏见。然后在415名儿童的独立第二次随机样本上测试修改的尺度。结果分析表明,36项总规模并不是单程,不适合Rasch模型。由于对Rasch模型的错误,从每个项目移除四个项目后,将保留了两种情感态度和行为意图。此外,当聚合两个最负响应类别时,缩放得到了改善。在修订的尺度上没有物品或学校水平没有物品偏见。评估认知态度的物品不适合Rasch模型,并且内部一致性低于规模。结论情感态度和行为意向捕获子尺度应单独处理。使用认知子级时应谨慎行事。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号