首页> 外文期刊>Dermatology: international journal for clinical and investigative dermatology >Paradoxical Hidradenitis Suppurativa in Patients Receiving TNF-alpha Inhibitors: Case Series, Systematic Review, and Case Meta-Analysis
【24h】

Paradoxical Hidradenitis Suppurativa in Patients Receiving TNF-alpha Inhibitors: Case Series, Systematic Review, and Case Meta-Analysis

机译:接受TNF-α抑制剂的患者矛盾的HIDradenenitiva:案例系列,系统审查和案例间分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background/Aims: TNF-alpha inhibitors represent the most advanced approved therapeutic option for moderate and severe forms of hidradenitis suppurativa (HS). However, in recent years, cases of paradoxical HS secondary to the use of these biological drugs have been described, with very few cases reported in the literature. The aims of this study are (1) to present 2 new cases of paradoxical HS and (2) to perform a systematic review of scientific evidence regarding paradoxical HS with TNF-alpha inhibitors. Material and Methods: This is a retrospective study in which we searched all the cases of paradoxical HS secondary to the use of TNF-alpha inhibitors published in the literature and included two additional cases observed in our clinical practice. Results: A total of 34 patients under TNF-alpha inhibitor treatment were included (adalimumab = 21; infliximab = 9; etanercept = 4). The median delay from exposure to TNF-alpha inhibitor and the development of paradoxical HS was 12 months (range 1-72). The majority of patients were Hurley stage II (58.8%). Clinical improvement and complete remission were more frequent when the TNF-alpha inhibitor was stopped or switched to another biological agent with a different therapeutic target rather than maintenance or change to another TNF-alpha inhibitor. Conclusions: Paradoxical HS is an unusual adverse effect of TNF-alpha inhibitors. When this adverse effect appears, interruption or substitution of treatment is associated with a better clinical outcome. (c) 2020 S. Karger AG, Basel
机译:背景/目的:TNF-α抑制剂代表中等和严重形式的HIDradenitisuptuativa(HS)的最先进的批准的治疗选择。然而,近年来,已经描述了二次使用这些生物药物的矛盾HS的病例,在文献中报告了很少的情况。本研究的目的是(1)呈现2例矛盾的HS和(2)的新病例,以对具有TNF-α抑制剂的矛盾HS进行系统审查。材料和方法:这是一种回顾性研究,其中我们搜查了在文献中发表的TNF-α抑制剂的使用矛盾的HS的所有病例,并包括在我们的临床实践中观察到的另外两种情况。结果:包括TNF-α抑制剂治疗中共34名患者(Adalimalab = 21; inciximab = 9; etanercept = 4)。从暴露于TNF-α抑制剂和矛盾HS的发育的中位延迟为12个月(范围1-72)。大多数患者是Hurley Stage II(58.8%)。当TNF-α抑制剂停止或切换到另一种具有不同治疗靶的生物试剂而不是维持或改变另一种TNF-α抑制剂时,更频繁地常常更频繁地频繁。结论:矛盾的HS是TNF-α抑制剂的不寻常不利影响。出现这种不良反应时,治疗的中断或替代与更好的临床结果有关。 (c)2020年S. Karger AG,巴塞尔

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号