...
首页> 外文期刊>Dermatologic therapy >Comparison of efficacy and safety of fractional radiofrequency and fractional Er:YAG laser in facial and neck wrinkles: Six‐year experience with 333 patients
【24h】

Comparison of efficacy and safety of fractional radiofrequency and fractional Er:YAG laser in facial and neck wrinkles: Six‐year experience with 333 patients

机译:小数射频和分数ER的功效和安全性比较:面部颈部皱纹的YAG激光:333例患者六年体验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Abstract Lasers and other light sources are popular treatment options for facial rejuvenation in recent years. In this study, we aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of fractional radiofrequency (RF) and fractional Erbium: YAG (Er:YAG) laser for facial and neck skin wrinkles, objectively. Three hundred and thirty‐three patients treated with fractional RF and fractional Er:YAG laser were evaluated by two blinded dermatologists. Fractional Er:YAG laser was more effective for the periorbital area; whereas fractional RF treatment was more effective for perioral, nasolabial and jawline areas. There was no statistically significant difference in side effects between two treatment groups. In conclusion, both modalities significantly improve skin wrinkles; however, it should be considered that there may be regional differences between the treatment outcomes of them.
机译:近年来,抽象激光器和其他光源是面部复兴的热门治疗选择。 在这项研究中,我们旨在比较分数射频(RF)和分数erbium的疗效和安全性:YAG(ER:YAG)激光用于面部和颈部皮肤皱纹,客观地。 用分数射频和分数ER治疗的三百三十三名患者:由两个盲的皮肤科医生评估YAG激光器。 分数呃:YAG激光对底骨区域更有效; 虽然分数射频处理对骨,鼻和颌骨区域更有效。 两种治疗组之间的副作用差异无统计学意义。 总之,两种方式都显着改善了皮肤皱纹; 但是,应该认为它们的治疗结果之间可能存在区域差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号