首页> 外文期刊>Depression and anxiety >Commentary on evidence in support of a grief-related condition as a DSM diagnosis
【24h】

Commentary on evidence in support of a grief-related condition as a DSM diagnosis

机译:评注关于悲伤相关病症作为DSM诊断的证据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The death of a loved one is one of life's greatest stressors. Most bereaved individuals experience a period of acute grief that diminishes in intensity as they adapt to the changes brought about by their loss. Over the past four decades, a growing body of research has focused on a form of prolonged grief that is painful and impairing. There is a substantial and growing evidence base that supports the validity and significance of a grief-related disorder, including the clinical value of being able to diagnose it and provide effective targeted treatment. ICD-11 will include a new diagnosis of prolonged grief disorder (PGD). DSM-5 called this condition persistent complex bereavement disorder (PCBD) and included it in Section III, signaling agreement that a diagnosis is warranted while further research is needed to determine the optimal criteria. Given the remaining uncertainties, reading this literature can be confusing. There is inconsistency in naming the condition (including complicated grief as well as PGD and PCBD) and lack of uniformity in identifying it, with respect to the optimal threshold and timeframe for distinguishing it from normal grief. As an introductory commentary for this Depression and Anxiety special edition on this form of grief, the authors discuss the history, commonalities, and key areas of variability in identifying this condition. We review the state of diagnostic criteria for DSM-5 and the current ICD-11 diagnostic guideline, highlighting the clinical relevance of making this diagnosis.
机译:亲人的死亡是生活中最伟大的压力之一。大多数失去的个人经历了一段时间的急剧悲伤,因为它们适应了他们损失所带来的变化。在过去的四十年中,一位越来越多的研究已经集中在一种长期悲伤的形式,这是痛苦和损害的。有一个实质性和不断增长的证据基础,支持与悲伤相关疾病的有效性和意义,包括能够诊断疾病的临床价值并提供有效的目标治疗。 ICD-11将包括延长悲伤障碍(PGD)的新诊断。 DSM-5称为该条件持续复杂的丧亲障碍(PCBD),并在第三节中包含,信令协议认为,诊断是必要的,同时需要进一步研究以确定最佳标准。鉴于剩余的不确定性,阅读这种文献可能会令人困惑。在命名条件(包括复杂的悲伤以及PGD和PCBD)方面存在不一致,并且在识别出识别它的缺乏均匀性,以区分其与正常悲伤的时间框架。作为这种抑郁症和焦虑特别版的介绍性评论,就这种形式的悲伤,作者讨论了识别这种情况的历史,共度和可变异的关键领域。我们审查DSM-5的诊断标准以及当前的ICD-11诊断指南,突出了使这一诊断的临床相关性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号