...
首页> 外文期刊>Alzheimer disease and associated disorders >Alzheimer special care units compared with traditional nursing home for dementia care: are there differences at admission and in clinical outcomes?
【24h】

Alzheimer special care units compared with traditional nursing home for dementia care: are there differences at admission and in clinical outcomes?

机译:与传统的老年痴呆症护理院相比,阿尔茨海默病特殊护理病房:入院和临床结局是否存在差异?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

BACKGROUND: Studies comparing Alzheimer Special Care Units (ASCUs) with traditional nursing homes (NHs) have reported conflicting results. OBJECTIVES: To compare the characteristics and the effects on mortality, hospitalization, use of physical restraints, falls, and antipsychotics among patients admitted to ASCUs or to NHs. METHODS: A sequential cohort of patients with dementia was recruited and followed for 18 months in a sample of randomly selected ASCUs and NHs. Data on socio-demographic, cognitive, functional, behavioral, and clinical characteristics, and drug exposure were collected at baseline and at 6-month intervals up to 18 months. RESULTS: A total of 349 patients were enrolled in 35 ASCUs and 81 in 9 NHs. Patients admitted to ASCUs were younger, cognitively and functionally less impaired, but had more behavioral disturbances than those in NH. During follow-up, ASCU patients had a lower risk of hospitalization (odds ratio: 0.67; 95% confidence interval: 0.46-0.99; P=0.04), and use of physicalrestraints (odds ratio: 0.66; 95% confidence interval: 0.51-0.86; P=0.003), and showed a higher rate of withdrawal of antipsychotics (P=0.003). No difference was found in mortality and falls. Propensity score analysis gives similar results. CONCLUSIONS: This study found that patients with dementia in ASCUs had different baseline clinical and functional characteristics from those in NHs. They had a lower rate of hospitalization and use of physical restraints at 6-month follow-up, and a higher probability of having antipsychotic agents withdrawn.
机译:背景:将阿尔茨海默病特殊护理单位(ASCU)与传统疗养院(NHs)进行比较的研究报告了相互矛盾的结果。目的:比较接受ASCU或NHs的患者的特征及其对死亡率,住院,使用物理约束,跌倒和抗精神病药的影响。方法:招募了一个连续性痴呆患者队列,并在随机选择的ASCU和NHs样本中随访了18个月。有关社会人口统计学,认知,功能,行为和临床特征以及药物暴露的数据是在基线和间隔18个月的6个月内收集的。结果:总共349例患者被纳入35个ASCU中,而81个患者被纳入9个NH中。接受ASCU的患者比NH的患者年轻,认知和功能受损较小,但行为障碍较多。在随访期间,ASCU患者的住院风险较低(几率:0.67; 95%置信区间:0.46-0.99; P = 0.04),并且使用了物理限制措施(几率:0.66; 95%置信区间:0.51- 0.86; P = 0.003),并显示出较高的抗精神病药物停药率(P = 0.003)。死亡率和跌倒率均无差异。倾向得分分析得出相似的结果。结论:这项研究发现,ASCU痴呆患者的基线临床和功能特征与NHs不同。在6个月的随访中,他们的住院率和身体约束使用率较低,并且撤回抗精神病药的可能性较高。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号