首页> 外文期刊>Hydrometallurgy >Variable surface passivation during direct leaching of sphalerite by ferric sulfate, ferric chloride, and ferric nitrate in a citrate medium
【24h】

Variable surface passivation during direct leaching of sphalerite by ferric sulfate, ferric chloride, and ferric nitrate in a citrate medium

机译:通过铁硫酸铁,氯化铁和硝酸铁直接浸出闪锌矿的可变表面钝化

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Direct leaching of sphalerite has been considered as a cost effective and an environmentally benign alternative to the traditional two-step roasting-leaching approach. Yet the slow leaching rate due to the formation of surface passivating phases remains the main challenge. Here, we studied the mechanism and kinetics of sphalerite leaching in the temperature range of 35-130 degrees C using three oxidants, Fe-2(SO4)(3), FeCl3, and Fe(NO3)(3), and observed distinctly different surface passivation and significantly different leaching rate. Leaching using Fe-2(SO4)(3) was the slowest, due to the formation of passivating surface layers of sulfur at the early stage and hydrated (Fe,Zn)-sulfates at the later stage. The formation of hydrated (Fe,Zn)-sulfates reduced Zn extraction by up to 20%, leading to incomplete Zn extraction. Using FeCl3, leaching was faster than in Fe-2(SO4)(3). However, the formation of surface sulfur also caused passivation. Leaching in Fe(NO3)(3) was the fastest, as the initially formed surface sulfur was quickly oxidized to sulfuric acid and hence passivation was negligible. Using Fe(NO3)(3), complete Zn extraction from 106 to 150 mu m sphalerite particles took 7 days at 35 degrees C, 2 days at 70 degrees C, 5 h at 90 degrees C, and 1 h at 130 degrees C. This is about one order of magnitude and two orders of magnitude faster than leaching in FeCl3 and Fe-2(SO4)(3), respectively. The observed leaching behaviors were in agreement with changing activation energy as a function of leaching extent, analyzed by the modified 'time-to-a-given-fraction' method. In the case of Fe-2(SO4)(3) and FeCl3, leaching was controlled by phase-boundary reactions at the early-to-middle stages, but changed to diffusion control at the later stage after the formation of passivating surface layers; in the case of Fe (NO3)(3), leaching was controlled by phase boundary reactions over the entire leaching process. This work demonstrates that Fe(NO3)(3) is the more efficient oxidant than FeCl3 and Fe-2(SO4)(3) for fast leaching of sphalerite at low temperatures with minimum surface passivation.
机译:斯普利特的直接浸出已被认为是传统的两步焙烧浸出方法的成本效益和环境良性的替代品。然而,由于表面钝化阶段的形成而导致的缓慢浸出率仍然是主要挑战。在这里,我们使用三个氧化剂,Fe-2(SO 4),FECL3和Fe(NO 3)(3),研究了35-130摄氏度温度范围内的温度范围内浸出的机制和动力学,并观察到明显不同表面钝化和显着不同的浸出率。使用Fe-2(SO4)(3)的浸出是最慢的,因为在早期阶段和水合(Fe,Zn) - 在后期的磺酸盐的钝化表面层的形成。水合(Fe,Zn)的形成 - 将锌萃取降低至多20%,导致Zn萃取不完全。使用FECL3,浸出比FE-2更快(SO4)(3)。然而,表面硫的形成也引起了钝化。在Fe(NO 3)(3)中浸出是最快的,因为最初形成的表面硫被迅速氧化成硫酸,因此钝化可忽略不计。使用Fe(NO 3)(3),完全Zn萃取从106-150μm的闪酸颗粒在35℃下以70度,在70℃,90℃下为5小时,1小时,1小时,在130℃下以7天。这大约是一个数量级,并且分别比FECL3和Fe-2(SO4)(3)中的浸入速度快两个数量级。观察到的浸出行为与改变激活能量作为浸出程度的函数进行了一致,通过修改的“时间 - 给出部分”方法分析。在Fe-2(SO4)(3)和FECL3的情况下,通过早期阶段的相 - 边界反应控制浸出,但在形成钝化表面层之后在后期改变为扩散控制;在Fe(3)(3)的情况下,通过整个浸出过程的相边界反应控制浸出。这项工作表明Fe(NO3)(3)是比FECL3和Fe-2(SO 4)(3)更有效的氧化剂,用于在低温下快速浸出具有最小表面钝化的低温。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号