首页> 外文期刊>Hydrology and Earth System Sciences >A review of the (Revised) Universal Soil Loss Equation ((R)USLE): with a view to increasing its global applicability and improving soil loss estimates
【24h】

A review of the (Revised) Universal Soil Loss Equation ((R)USLE): with a view to increasing its global applicability and improving soil loss estimates

机译:(修订后)通用土壤损失方程((R)USLE)审查:以期提高其全球适用性和改善土壤损失估算

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Soil erosion is a major problem around the world because of its effects on soil productivity, nutrient loss, siltation in water bodies, and degradation of water quality. By understanding the driving forces behind soil erosion, we can more easily identify erosion-prone areas within a landscape to address the problem strategically. Soil erosion models have been used to assist in this task. One of the most commonly used soil erosion models is the Universal Soil Loss Equation (USLE) and its family of models: the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation (RUSLE), the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation version 2 (RUSLE2), and the Modified Universal Soil Loss Equation (MUSLE). This paper reviews the different sub-factors of USLE and RUSLE, and analyses how different studies around the world have adapted the equations to local conditions. We compiled these studies and equations to serve as a reference for other researchers working with (R) USLE and related approaches. Within each sub-factor section, the strengths and limitations of the different equations are discussed, and guidance is given as to which equations may be most appropriate for particular climate types, spatial resolution, and temporal scale. We investigate some of the limitations of existing (R) USLE formulations, such as uncertainty issues given the simple empirical nature of the model and many of its sub-components; uncertainty issues around data availability; and its inability to account for soil loss from gully erosion, mass wasting events, or predicting potential sediment yields to streams. Recommendations on how to overcome some of the uncertainties associated with the model are given. Several key future directions to refine it are outlined: e.g. incorporating soil loss from other types of soil erosion, estimating soil loss at sub-annual temporal scales, and compiling consistent units for the future literature to reduce confusion and errors caused by mismatching units. The potential of combining (R) USLE wi
机译:土壤侵蚀是世界各地的主要问题,因为它对土壤生产率,营养损失,水体淤积的影响以及水质的降解。通过了解土壤侵蚀背后的驱动力,我们可以更容易地识别景观中的侵蚀地区来解决问题。土壤侵蚀模型已被用来协助这项任务。最常用的土壤侵蚀模型之一是通用土壤损失方程(USLE)及其模型系列:修订后的通用土壤损失方程(风格),修订的通用土壤损失方程版本2(Rusle2)和改进的通用土壤损失方程(Mustle)。本文审查了ULLE和RUSLE的不同子因素,并分析了世界各地的不同研究改编了对当地条件的方程。我们编制了这些研究和方程,作为与(R)USLE和相关方法合作的其他研究人员的参考。在每个子因子部分内,讨论了不同方程的强度和限制,并给出了哪些方程可以最适合特定的气候类型,空间分辨率和时间标度。我们调查现有(R)USLE制剂的一些局限性,例如鉴于模型的简单实证性质和许多子组件的不确定性问题;数据可用性周围的不确定性问题;它无法解释来自沟壑侵蚀,大众浪费事件的土壤损失,或预测流潜在的沉积物。关于如何克服如何克服与模型相关的一些不确定性的建议。概述了几个关键的未来方向,概述了:例如将土壤损失从其他类型的土壤侵蚀纳入,估算亚年度时间尺度的土壤损失,并为未来文献编制一致的单位,以减少不匹配单位引起的混淆和错误。组合(r)elle wi的潜力

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号