首页> 外文期刊>Human movement science >Higher order balance control: Distinct effects between cognitive task and manual steadiness constraint on automatic postural responses
【24h】

Higher order balance control: Distinct effects between cognitive task and manual steadiness constraint on automatic postural responses

机译:高阶平衡控制:认知任务与自动姿势响应的手工稳定约束的不同影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In the present experiment, we aimed to evaluate the interactive effect of performing a cognitive task simultaneously with a manual task requiring either high or low steadiness on APRs. Young volunteers performed the task of recovering upright balance following a mechanical perturbation provoked by unanticipatedly releasing a load pulling the participant's body backwards. The postural task was performed while holding a cylinder steadily on a tray. One group performed that task under high (cylinder round side down) and another one under low (cylinder flat side down) manual steadiness constraint. Those tasks were evaluated in the conditions of performing concurrently a cognitive numeric subtraction task and under no cognitive task. Analysis showed that performance of the cognitive task led to increased body and tray displacement, associated with higher displacement at the hip and upper trunk, and lower magnitude of activation of the GM muscle in response to the perturbation. Conversely, high manual steadiness constraint led to reduced tray velocity in association with lower values of trunk displacement, and decreased rotation amplitude at the ankle and hip joints. We found no interactions between the effects of the cognitive and manual tasks on APRs, suggesting that they were processed in parallel in the generation of responses for balance recovery. Modulation of postural responses from the manual and cognitive tasks indicates participation of higher order neural structures in the generation of APRs, with postural responses being affected by multiple mental processes occurring in parallel. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:在目前的实验中,我们旨在评估同时执行认知任务的交互式效果,并在APRS上使用需要高或低稳定性的手动任务。年轻的志愿者在通过意识到释放的载荷向后释放的负荷释放的机械扰动之后恢复直立平衡的任务。姿势任务是在稳定在托盘上稳定的同时进行的。一组在高(圆柱圆形侧)下的任务执行该任务,另一组在低(圆筒平面下)下方的另一个手动稳定约束。这些任务是在同时执行认知数减法任务和没有认知任务的条件下进行评估的。分析表明,认知任务的性能导致了臀部和上躯干上较高位移相关的身体和托盘位移,以及GM肌肉的较低率响应于扰动而较低的激活。相反,高手动稳定性约束导致与较低的躯干位移值相关联的托盘速度,并且在脚踝和髋关节处减少旋转幅度。我们发现了认知和手动任务的影响与APRS之间没有相互作用,这表明它们并行于产生余额恢复的响应时并行处理。从手动和认知任务的姿势响应调制表明,高阶神经结构在APRS的产生中的参与,姿势反应受到并行发生的多种心理过程的影响。 (c)2016年Elsevier B.v.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号