...
首页> 外文期刊>HortTechnology >Comparison of Presentation Method Effectiveness for Dissemination of Pesticide-free Turfgrass Management Information
【24h】

Comparison of Presentation Method Effectiveness for Dissemination of Pesticide-free Turfgrass Management Information

机译:呈现方法效果效果的比较,用于传播农药的草坪草原管理信息

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This study examined how different presentation formats affected knowledge gain among school grounds managers. Results indicate large-group participants (presentation to approximate to 50 participants at a turfgrass field day) had greater knowledge retention than small-group participants (presentation to 6-10 participants at an interactive workshop). Small-group attendees had more flexibility to discuss issues that affected them directly and may have focused on those issues instead of the targeted information. Large-group meetings were more ridged in format and attendees were less able to deviate from the main subject matter being presented. However, the value of the small-group meeting should not be discounted, especially when athletic field grounds managers and staff require information specific to their situation. When disseminating more general information, the large-group meeting format is a better means of delivery.
机译:本研究审查了如何在校园经理之间影响知识增益的不同展示格式。 结果表明大型参与者(展示Turfrass Field日的50名参与者)比小集团参与者(互动研讨会上的6-10名参与者展示到6-10名参与者)更大的知识保留。 小组与会者更灵活地讨论直接影响他们的问题,可能会集中在这些问题上而不是目标信息。 大型会议更加脊状格式,与会者不太能够偏离所呈现的主要主题。 但是,小组会议的价值不应折扣,特别是当运动场地面管理者和工作人员需要特定于其情况时的信息。 在传播更一般信息时,大型会议格式是更好的交付方式。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号