首页> 外文期刊>AJR: American Journal of Roentgenology : Including Diagnostic Radiology, Radiation Oncology, Nuclear Medicine, Ultrasonography and Related Basic Sciences >Preoperative imaging of anterior shoulder instability: Diagnostic effectiveness of MDCT arthrography and comparison with MR arthrography and arthroscopy
【24h】

Preoperative imaging of anterior shoulder instability: Diagnostic effectiveness of MDCT arthrography and comparison with MR arthrography and arthroscopy

机译:肩关节前不稳定的术前影像:MDCT关节造影的诊断有效性以及与MR关节造影和关节镜的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this article is to assess the diagnostic effectiveness of MDCT arthrography in the preoperative planning of anterior shoulder instability compared with MR arthrography and arthroscopy. Subjects and met hods. Shoulder MDCT arthrography and MR arthrography examinations prospectively performed in 40 consecutive patients (30 male and 10 female patients; mean age, 26 years) were independently evaluated by two musculoskeletal radiologists who were blinded to the arthroscopic findings, which represented the reference standard. Sensitivity, specificity, and agreement with arthroscopy were determined for osseous, cartilage, and labroligamentous injuries. RESULTS. In detecting glenoid rim fractures, MDCT arthrography had a sensitivity of 100% (12/12), a specificity of 96% (27/28), and better agreement with surgery (κ = 0.94) than did MR arthrography (κ = 0.74). For the depiction of glenoid cartilage lesions, MDCT arthrography had a sensitivity of 82% (18/22), a specificity of 89% (16/18), and slightly better agreement with surgery (κ = 0.70) than did MR arthrography (κ = 0.66). In identifying anterior labral periosteal sleeve avulsion lesions, MDCT arthrography had a sensitivity of 93% (26/28), a specificity of 100% (12/12), and better agreement with surgery (κ = 0.89) than did MR arthrography (κ = 0.74). For the diagnosis of humeral avulsion of the inferior glenohumeral ligament lesions, MDCT arthrography had a sensitivity and a specificity of 100% (2/2) and better agreement with surgery (κ = 1) than did MR arthrography (κ = 0.79). CONCLUSION. MDCT arthrography showed better accuracy than did MR arthrography in the detection of osseous, cartilage, and labroligamentous injuries related to anterior shoulder instability. Because MDCT arthrography was particularly reliable for the detection of glenoid rim fractures and humeral avulsion of the inferior glenohumeral ligament lesions, which represent crucial findings in the preoperative planning, this technique may beneficially affect treatment by means of selecting the proper surgical treatment.
机译:目的。本文的目的是评估与MR关节造影和关节镜检查相比,MDCT关节造影在肩部前部不稳定术前计划中的诊断效果。受试者和遇见的人。前瞻性地对连续40例患者(30例男性和10例女性患者;平均年龄26岁)进行了肩部MDCT关节镜检查和MR关节镜检查,该检查由两名不熟悉关节镜检查结果的肌肉骨骼放射科医生独立评估,这是参考标准。确定了骨性,软骨性和唇iga性损伤的敏感性,特异性和与关节镜的一致性。结果。在检测关节盂边缘骨折时,MDCT关节造影比MR关节造影(κ= 0.74)的敏感性为100%(12/12),特异性为96%(27/28),并且与手术的一致性更好(κ= 0.94)。 。对于关节盂软骨病变的描述,MDCT关节造影的敏感性为82%(18/22),特异性为89%(16/18),并且与MR关节造影(κ= 0.70)的手术一致性稍好(κ= 0.70) = 0.66)。在确定前唇唇周骨膜撕脱性病变方面,MDCT关节造影的敏感性为93%(26/28),特异性为100%(12/12),与MR关节造影(κ= 0.89)的手术一致性更高(κ= 0.89) = 0.74)。为了诊断肱骨下韧带韧带撕脱,MDCT造影的敏感性和特异性为100%(2/2),与手术的吻合度(κ= 1)比MR造影(κ= 0.79)好。结论。在检测与前肩不稳相关的骨,软骨和唇iga肌损伤方面,MDCT关节造影显示出比MR关节造影更高的准确性。因为MDCT关节造影在检测盂下缘韧带损伤和肱骨撕脱性骨折方面特别可靠,这代表了术前计划中的关键发现,所以该技术可能会通过选择适当的手术方法来有益地影响治疗。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号