首页> 外文期刊>Horticulture Week >How bad for fresh produce are Government plans on migration?
【24h】

How bad for fresh produce are Government plans on migration?

机译:对新鲜农产品有多糟糕的是政府迁移计划?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The Government's restrictive post-2020 migration policy plans announced last month leave growers with only the (still unconfirmed) hope of an expanded seasonal agricultural worker scheme (SAWS) as a source of future temporary labour — and growers' representatives have been quick to express their alarm.In terms of sheer numbers, the UK soft-fruit sector, which employs around 29,000 seasonal workers a year, 99 per cent from overseas, has most to lose. Nicholas Marston, chair of industry body British Summer Fruits, tells Horticulture Week that while welcoming the expansion of the seasonal worker pilot scheme to 10,000 permits this season, "there is currently no commitment from Government to extend it beyond this year, which is a huge concern". Even if the scheme were to be rolled over into subsequent years "it would not remotely fill the industry's need for seasonal workers once access to these jobs for workers from the EU ends", he points out.
机译:政府的限制性后2020年移民政策计划上个月宣布,只有(仍然未经证实)希望扩大的季节性农业工人计划(锯)作为未来临时劳动的来源,以及种植者代表一直很快就表达他们的 闹钟。在纯粹的数字,英国软果行业,每年雇用大约29,000名季节性工人,从海外99%雇用,最大限度地失去了。 Nicholas Marston,行业士兵英国夏季果实,告诉园艺周,同时欢迎季节性工人试点计划的扩大到本赛季,“目前没有政府的承诺将其延伸到今年以后,这是一个巨大的 忧虑”。 即使将该计划转移到随后的年份“它不会远程填补行业对季节性工人的需求,曾经为欧盟的工人获得这些工作”,他指出。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号