首页> 外文期刊>AJR: American Journal of Roentgenology : Including Diagnostic Radiology, Radiation Oncology, Nuclear Medicine, Ultrasonography and Related Basic Sciences >Training the ACRIN 6666 investigators and effects of feedback on breast ultrasound interpretive performance and agreement in BI-RADS ultrasound feature analysis
【24h】

Training the ACRIN 6666 investigators and effects of feedback on breast ultrasound interpretive performance and agreement in BI-RADS ultrasound feature analysis

机译:培训ACRIN 6666研究人员以及BI-RADS超声特征分析中反馈对乳房超声解释性能和一致性的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

OBJECTIVE. Qualification tasks in mammography and breast ultrasound were developed for the American College of Radiology Imaging Network (ACRIN) 6666 Investigators. We sought to assess the effects of feedback on breast ultrasound interpretive performance and agreement in BI-RADS feature analysis among a subset of these experienced observers. MATERIALS AND METHODS. After a 1-hour didactic session on BI-RADS: Ultrasound, an interpretive skills quiz set of 70 orthogonal sets of breast ultrasound images including 25 (36%) malignancies was presented to 100 experienced breast imaging observers. Thirty-five observers reviewed the quiz set twice: first without and then with immediate feedback of consensus feature analysis, management recommendations, and pathologic truth. Observer performance (sensitivity, specificity, area under the curve [AUC]) was calculated without feedback and with feedback. Kappas were determined for agreement on feature analysis and assessments. RESULTS. For 35 observers without feedback, the mean sensitivity was 89% (range, 68-100%); specificity, 62% (range, 42-82%); and AUC, 82% (range, 73-89%). With feedback, the mean sensitivity was 93% (range, 80-100%; mean increase, 4%; range of increase, 0-12%; p < 0.0001), the mean specificity was 61% (range, 45-73%; mean decrease, 1%; range of change, -18% to 11%; p = 0.19), and the mean AUC was 84% (range, 78-90%; mean increase, 2%; range of change, -3% to 9%; p < 0.0001). Three breast imagers in the lowest quartile of initial performance showed the greatest improvement in sensitivity with no change or improvement in AUC. The kappa values for feature analysis did not change, but there was improved agreement about final assessments, with the kappa value increasing from 0.53 (SE, 0.02) without feedback to 0.59 (SE, 0.02) with feedback (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION. Most experienced breast imagers showed excellent breast ultrasound interpretive skills. Immediate feedback of consensus BI-RADS: Ultrasound features and histopathologic results improved performance in ultrasound interpretation across all experience variables.
机译:目的。乳腺摄影和乳房超声检查的资格鉴定任务是为美国放射学院成像网络(ACRIN)6666研究人员开发的。我们试图评估这些经验丰富的观察者的一部分中,反馈对BI-RADS特征分析中的乳房超声解释性能和一致性的影响。材料和方法。在BI-RADS:Ultrasound上进行了1个小时的教学后,向100位经验丰富的乳腺成像观察者展示了70个正交的乳房超声图像(包括25个(36%)恶性肿瘤)的解释技能测验。三十五名观察员对测验集进行了两次审查:首先没有共识,然后立即获得共识,包括共识特征分析,管理建议和病理事实。在没有反馈和有反馈的情况下计算观察者的表现(敏感性,特异性,曲线下面积[AUC])。确定了Kappas,以便就特征分析和评估达成协议。结果。对于35位没有反馈的观察者,平均灵敏度为89%(范围68-100%);特异性62%(范围42-82%);和AUC为82%(范围为73-89%)。有反馈,平均敏感性为93%(范围80-100%;平均增加4%;增加范围0-12%; p <0.0001),平均特异性为61%(范围45-73%) ;平均下降幅度为1%;变化幅度为-18%至11%; p = 0.19),平均AUC为84%(幅度变化为78-90%;平均增长幅度为2%;变化幅度为-3 %至9%; p <0.0001)。初始性能最低的四分位数中的三个乳房成像仪显示出灵敏度的最大提高,而AUC没有变化或没有改善。用于特征分析的kappa值没有变化,但是关于最终评估的协议有所改善,kappa值从无反馈的0.53(SE,0.02)增加到有反馈的0.59(SE,0.02)(p <0.0001)。结论。大多数经验丰富的乳房成像人员表现出出色的乳房超声解释能力。共识BI-RADS的即时反馈:超声特征和组织病理学结果改善了所有经验变量在超声解释中的表现。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号