首页> 外文期刊>Hospital pharmacy. >Change in Management of Status Epilepticus With the Addition of Neurointensivist-Led Neurocritical Care Team at a Rural Academic Medical Center
【24h】

Change in Management of Status Epilepticus With the Addition of Neurointensivist-Led Neurocritical Care Team at a Rural Academic Medical Center

机译:在农村学术医疗中心添加神经节医生LED神经科护理团队的状态癫痫患者的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Learning Objective: Status epilepticus (SE) is continuous clinical and/or electrographic seizures lasting 5 minutes or more without recovery and carries a high mortality. Medication management varies by institution, as well as administration, combination of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), and dosing. Methods: Single-center retrospective review of medication management of SE patients admitted to West Virginia University Hospital before and after neurointensivist implemented guidelines. Patients admitted between January 2012 and June 2014 were grouped in the prior to neurointensivist group (pre-NI) and patients admitted between July 2014 and June 2016 were grouped in the postneurointensivist group (post-NI). Baseline demographics, hospital, intensive care unit (ICU), and ventilator length of stay were recorded. Medications reviewed included number of AEDs and maximum dose of lorazepam, phenytoin, levetiracetam, and lacosamide. Outcomes included number of continuous infusions of either midazolam or propofol at seizure suppression doses as well as pentobarbital, phenobarbital, or ketamine, and need for vasopressor use. Results: Of the 74 patients included, the pre-NI group (n = 40) utilized more AEDs (6 vs 4) compared with the post-NI group (n = 34). The pre-NI group had less midazolam continuous infusions meeting seizure suppression doses (8 vs 9), but higher average doses (49 vs 27 mg/h) compared with the post-NI group. More patients in the pre-NI group were on propofol seizure suppression doses (15 vs 10) and phenobarbital continuous infusions (I I vs 2) than the post-NI group. Patients had less vasopressor use in the post-NI group than the pre-NI group (I I vs 23). Frequency and dosing of lorazepam, phenytoin, levetiracetam, and lacosamide were similar between the 2 groups. Ventilator use, hospital, and ICU length of stay were also similar between groups. Discussion: Implementation of a neurointensivist and medication guidelines resulted in fewer AEDs and less vasopressor use in the management of SE. Midazolam use was slightly higher in the post-NI group but at lower doses overall.
机译:学习目的:状态癫痫(SE)是连续的临床和/或拍摄癫痫发作,持续5分钟或更长时间而不会恢复并带有高死亡率。药物管理由机构而异,以及抗癫痫药物(AED)和给药的组合。方法:在近期和神经节目前后,患者患者的药物治疗单中心回顾性审查,在西弗吉尼亚大学医院进行神经期医师实施指南。 2012年1月至2014年6月在2014年6月期间录取的患者在神经节目群体(前NI)之前进行了分组,并在2014年7月至2016年6月期间录取的患者在后续期间进行了群体(NI后)。记录了基线人口统计学,医院,重症监护室(ICU)和呼吸机住院长度。审查的药物包括洛拉西泮,苯妥汀,左旋虫和漆酰胺的AED和最大剂量的数量。结果包括癫痫抑制剂量的咪达唑仑或异丙酚的连续输注次数以及戊巴比妥,苯巴比妥或氯胺,以及需要血管加压糖剂使用。结果:与第Ni组(N = 34)相比,Ni患者包括的74名患者(n = 40)使用更多AED(6 Vs 4)。前Ni组的咪达唑仑连续输注较少见癫痫发作剂量(8 Vs 9),但与后Ni组相比,较高的平均剂量(49毫克/小时)。更多患者在前NI组患者均在丙比酚癫痫发作剂(15 vs 10)和苯巴比的连续输注(I vs 2)上,而不是NI后组。患者在NI后的血管加压剂上使用较少的血管加压剂比前NI群组(I I I VS 23)。洛拉西泮,苯妥汀,左旋虫和漆酰胺的频率和剂量在2组之间相似。呼吸机使用,医院和ICU的逗留时间也相似。讨论:对神经节目和药物治疗指南的实施导致较少的AED和较少的血管加压剂在SE管理中使用。在NI后,MidazoLam使用略高,但整体较低剂量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号