首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Hospital Pharmacy >Change in Management of Status Epilepticus With the Addition of Neurointensivist-Led Neurocritical Care Team at a Rural Academic Medical Center
【2h】

Change in Management of Status Epilepticus With the Addition of Neurointensivist-Led Neurocritical Care Team at a Rural Academic Medical Center

机译:在乡村学术医疗中心增加由神经强化药主导的神经重症监护小组以改变癫痫持续状态的管理

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Learning Objective: Status epilepticus (SE) is continuous clinical and/or electrographic seizures lasting 5 minutes or more without recovery and carries a high mortality. Medication management varies by institution, as well as administration, combination of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), and dosing. >Methods: Single-center retrospective review of medication management of SE patients admitted to West Virginia University Hospital before and after neurointensivist implemented guidelines. Patients admitted between January 2012 and June 2014 were grouped in the prior to neurointensivist group (pre-NI) and patients admitted between July 2014 and June 2016 were grouped in the postneurointensivist group (post-NI). Baseline demographics, hospital, intensive care unit (ICU), and ventilator length of stay were recorded. Medications reviewed included number of AEDs and maximum dose of lorazepam, phenytoin, levetiracetam, and lacosamide. Outcomes included number of continuous infusions of either midazolam or propofol at seizure suppression doses as well as pentobarbital, phenobarbital, or ketamine, and need for vasopressor use. >Results: Of the 74 patients included, the pre-NI group (n = 40) utilized more AEDs (6 vs 4) compared with the post-NI group (n = 34). The pre-NI group had less midazolam continuous infusions meeting seizure suppression doses (8 vs 9), but higher average doses (49 vs 27 mg/h) compared with the post-NI group. More patients in the pre-NI group were on propofol seizure suppression doses (15 vs 10) and phenobarbital continuous infusions (11 vs 2) than the post-NI group. Patients had less vasopressor use in the post-NI group than the pre-NI group (11 vs 23). Frequency and dosing of lorazepam, phenytoin, levetiracetam, and lacosamide were similar between the 2 groups. Ventilator use, hospital, and ICU length of stay were also similar between groups. >Discussion: Implementation of a neurointensivist and medication guidelines resulted in fewer AEDs and less vasopressor use in the management of SE. Midazolam use was slightly higher in the post-NI group but at lower doses overall.
机译:>学习目标:癫痫持续状态(SE)是持续5分钟或更长时间的连续临床和/或电图惊厥,无recovery愈,死亡率高。药物管理因机构,给药方式,抗癫痫药(AED)组合和剂量而异。 >方法:在神经强化医师实施指南前后,对西弗吉尼亚大学医院收治的SE患者的药物治疗进行单中心回顾性研究。在2012年1月至2014年6月期间入院的患者在神经强化治疗组(NI之前)分组,在2014年7月至2016年6月之间入院的患者在神经强化后组(NI后)分组。记录基线人口统计资料,医院,重症监护病房(ICU)和呼吸机的住院时间。审查的药物包括AED的数量以及劳拉西m,苯妥英钠,左乙拉西坦和拉考酰胺的最大剂量。结果包括以癫痫发作抑制剂量连续服用咪达唑仑或丙泊酚以及戊巴比妥,苯巴比妥或氯胺酮的次数,以及是否需要使用血管加压药。 >结果:在纳入的74例患者中,NI前组(n = 40)比NI后组(n = 34)使用了更多的AED(6 vs 4)。与NI后组相比,NI前组的咪达唑仑连续输注达到癫痫发作抑制剂量的次数较少(8 vs 9),但平均剂量较高(49 vs 27 mg / h)。与NI后组相比,NI前组中接受异丙酚惊厥抑制剂量(15对10)和苯巴比妥连续输注(11对2)的患者更多。 NI后组的患者使用血管加压药的人数少于NI前组(11比23)。两组的劳拉西m,苯妥英钠,左乙拉西坦和拉考酰胺的频率和剂量相似。两组之间的呼吸机使用,医院和ICU住院时间也相似。 >讨论:实施神经强化药和药物治疗指南可减少SE的治疗中AED的使用和血管升压药的使用。 NI后组的咪达唑仑使用量稍高,但总体剂量较低。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号