首页> 外文期刊>Trends in Ecology & Evolution >Evidence-Based Reviews: How Evidence-Based Practices are Systematically Identified
【24h】

Evidence-Based Reviews: How Evidence-Based Practices are Systematically Identified

机译:基于循证的审查:如何系统地确定基于证据的实践

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Evidence-based reviews are a type of systematic literature review used to identify evidence-based practices. When conducting an evidence-based review, researchers apply predetermined standards to identify evidence-based practices-practices that have been shown to reliably improve an outcome for a population of learners, according to evidence from a body of rigorous, experimental studies. In this article, we describe evidence-based reviews, provide an overview of one set of evidence standards used in special education, and describe important caveats and considerations related to evidence-based reviews. We conclude with two examples of evidence-based reviews in the field of learning disabilities. Our take-home message is that evidence-based reviews are a trustworthy approach for identifying generally effective instructional practices-but no practices, not even evidence-based practices, are effective for all learners.
机译:循证审查是一种用于识别基于证据的实践的系统文献综述。 根据严格实验研究的证据,研究人员在进行基于证据的审查时,将识别基于证据的实践,以确定已被证明可以可靠地改善学习者人群的结果。 在本文中,我们描述了基于循证的审查,概述了特殊教育中使用的一套证据标准,并描述了与循证审查相关的重要警告和考虑因素。 我们在学习障碍领域的两个证据审查中得出结论。 我们的回家留言是基于循证的审查是一种值得信赖的方法,可以确定一般有效的教学实践 - 但没有做法,甚至没有证据的实践,对所有学习者都有效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号