首页> 外文期刊>Trends in Ecology & Evolution >Determining Whether the Impacts of Introduced Species Are Negative Cannot Be Based Solely on Science: A Response to Russell and Blackburn
【24h】

Determining Whether the Impacts of Introduced Species Are Negative Cannot Be Based Solely on Science: A Response to Russell and Blackburn

机译:确定引入的物种的影响是否为负数不能仅基于科学:对罗素和布莱克本的反应

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In a recent article in TREE, Russell and Blackburn [1] consider that challenging the negative impacts of invasive alien species (IAS) is akin to science denialism and, by citing and referring to our work, implicitly denounce us as science or IAS denialists. Furthermore, they draw strong parallels between IAS denialists and those who deny the ‘risks of tobacco smoking or immunisation, the causes of AIDS or climate change'. We find this allusion to be poorly considered and indefensible.
机译:在最近的树中,Russell和Blackburn [1]认为,挑战侵袭性外来物种(IAS)的负面影响是基于科学否认,并通过引用和指的是我们的工作,隐含地谴责我们作为科学或IAS拒绝主义者。 此外,他们在IAS拒绝主义者和那些否认烟草吸烟或免疫风险,艾滋病或气候变化的原因之间的人之间绘制了强大的平行。 我们发现这种暗示被认为是不可审查和无法侵染的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号