...
首页> 外文期刊>The Mariner's mirror >The English Search for a Northeast Passage to Asia Reconsidered: How 'Flemish' fishermen put the Edward Bonaventure in jeopardy on its return journey in 1554
【24h】

The English Search for a Northeast Passage to Asia Reconsidered: How 'Flemish' fishermen put the Edward Bonaventure in jeopardy on its return journey in 1554

机译:英语搜索东北通道到亚洲重新考虑:“佛兰芒”渔民如何在1554年返回危险之旅

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In 1553 the Edward Bonaventure set sail from England with two other ships to search for a Northeast Passage to Asia. Eventually the ship made it to the White Sea and the captain of the ship, Richard Chancellor, reached Moscow where he met Tsar Ivan IV, 'the Terrible', at the Kremlin. In 1554 the ship returned to England but was 'robbed by Flemings', according to Richard Hakluyt. The discovery of a case file in the archives of the Great Council of Malines,the supreme court of the Netherlands in the sixteenth century, concerning the robbing of the Edward Bonaventure on its return voyage offers a new perspective on the spectacular first English expedition which resulted in the discovery of the North Cape and Anglo-Russian trade connections and diplomatic relations. Besides offering new knowledge on England's pioneering voyage of 1553, this article explores possibilities and limitations of case files for historical research and offers a revealing example of political pressure on legal decision-making and shows that legal institutions were not necessarily the puppets of their rulers.
机译:在1553年,Edward Bonaventure与其他两艘船一起驾驶英格兰,以寻找东北通道到亚洲。最终船舶向白海和船长,理查德校长,到达莫斯科,在那里他遇到了克里姆林宫的沙皇Ivan四,“可怕”。根据Richard Hakluyt的说法,在1554年返回英格兰,但被“抢劫”被“抢劫”。在第十六世纪荷兰最高法院的霍尔伟大的马林山馆长档案中发现了案件文件,关于其返回航行的Edward Bonaventure抢劫了令人瞩目的第一个英国探险的新观点在发现北角和英国贸易联系和外交关系中。除了为英格兰的开创性航行提供新的1553年的新知识外,本文探讨了历史研究案件文件的可能性和局限,并为法律决策的政治压力提供了一个揭示的例子,并表明法律机构不一定是统治者的木偶。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号