首页> 外文期刊>HNO >The adaptive Freiburgmonosyllabic test in noise. Development of a procedure and comparison of the results with the Oldenburg sentence test
【24h】

The adaptive Freiburgmonosyllabic test in noise. Development of a procedure and comparison of the results with the Oldenburg sentence test

机译:噪声中自适应的弗莱古代肌肉测试。 开发与Oldenburg句子测试结果的程序和比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BackgroundWhereas sentence tests are commonly performed using an adaptive procedure, this method has not yet been transferred to the Freiburg monosyllabic speech test, the most important word test. When using different procedures, acomparison of results between sentence and word tests is not possible. Therefore, an adaptive procedure which has proven itself in sentence tests was transferred to the Freiburg monosyllabic test in noise. The results of the new procedure were compared to the standard of sentence tests, i.e., the Oldenburg sentence test.MethodsThe adaptive Freiburg monosyllabic speech test and the Oldenburg sentence test were applied in 40 otologically normal subjects in arandomized order. Results were analyzed with respect to time requirements, possible gender differences, the influence of test order, and correlation of test results.ResultsThe time required for the adaptive Freiburg monosyllabic speech test was significantly higher than for the Oldenburg sentence test. No significant impact of gender or test order could be shown. The mean signal-to-noise ratio for 50% speech discrimination of the Oldenburg sentence test was significantly smaller than for the adaptive Freiburg monosyllabic speech test. No correlation could be shown between the results of the two testsConclusionThe Freiburg monosyllabic test can not only be used for quantifying discrimination loss in percentage terms, but also to measure the 50% speech recognition threshold with an adaptive algorithm. However, the procedure of the adaptive Freiburg monosyllabic test is more time consuming than that of the Oldenburg sentence test. Concerning apossible missing correlation between the results for 50% speech discrimination, further studies with hearing-impaired persons are needed.
机译:BackgroundWhereas句子测试通常使用自适应过程进行,这种方法尚未转移到弗赖堡单音琴弦言论,最重要的单词测试。使用不同的程序时,句子和单词测试之间的结果的ACOMANISON是不可能的。因此,在句子测试中证明自己的自适应程序被转移到噪声中的弗赖堡单糖基标测试。将新程序的结果与句子测试标准进行比较,即Oldenburg句子测试。在40个题型正常受试者中,在Arandomized令中应用了Adaptive Freiburg单音型语音测试和奥伦堡句测试。关于时间要求,可能的性别差异,测试阶的影响以及测试结果的相关性分析了结果。适应性弗莱堡单音琴语音试验所需的时间明显高于Oldenburg句子测试。可以显示性别或测试订单的重大影响。 50%语音歧视的平均信噪比古堡句子测试明显小于自适应弗赖堡单音琴弦言语测试。两种测试的结果之间没有相关性可以在弗赖堡单音节测试之间进行弗莱堡单音节测试,不能用于量化百分比术语的辨别损失,而且还可以通过自适应算法测量50%语音识别阈值。然而,自适应弗赖堡单音琴测试的程序比古老堡句测试更耗时。关于50%语音歧视的结果之间的缺失相关性,需要进行听力受损人员的进一步研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号