首页> 外文期刊>Hip international: the journal of clinical and experimental research on hip pathology and therapy >Lack of consensus on optimal acetabular cup orientation because of variation in assessment methods in total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review
【24h】

Lack of consensus on optimal acetabular cup orientation because of variation in assessment methods in total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review

机译:由于总髋关节置换术评估方法的变化,对最佳髋臼杯取向缺乏共识:系统评价

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Introduction: Dislocation is 1 of the main reasons for revision of total hip arthroplasty but dislocation rates have not changed in the past decades, compromising patients' well-being. Acetabular cup orientation plays a key role in implant stability and has been widely studied. This article investigates whether there is a consensus on optimal cup orientation, which is necessary when using a navigation system. Methods: A systematic search of the literature in the PubMed, Embase and Cochrane databases was performed (March 2017) to identify articles that investigated the direct relationship between cup orientation and dislocation, including a thorough evaluation of postoperative cup orientation assessment methods. Results: 28 relevant articles evaluating a direct relation between dislocation and cup orientation could not come to a consensus. The key reason is a lack of uniformity in the assessment of cup orientation. Cup orientation is assessed with different imaging modalities, different methodologies, different definitions for inclination and anteversion, several reference planes and distinct patient positions. Conclusions: All available studies lack uniformity in cup orientation assessment; therefore it is impossible to reach consensus on optimal cup orientation. Using navigation systems for placement of the cup is inevitably flawed when using different definitions in the preoperative planning, peroperative placement and postoperative evaluation. Further methodological development is required to assess cup orientation. Consequently, the postoperative assessment should be uniform, thus differentiating between anterior and posterior dislocation, use the same definitions for inclination and anteversion with the same reference plane and with the patient in the same position.
机译:简介:脱位是修订总髋关节置换术的主要原因,但在过去的几十年里,脱位率没有改变,损害患者的福祉。髋臼杯取向在植入物稳定性中起着关键作用,并已被广泛研究。本文调查了在使用导航系统时是最佳杯中取向的共识。方法:执行(2017年3月)对文献中的文献进行了系统搜索,以确定调查杯中取向和错位之间直接关系的文章,包括术后杯中疗效评估方法的彻底评估。结果:28例相关文章评估了脱位和杯中取向之间的直接关系,无法达成共识。关键原因是评估杯取向的缺乏均匀性。用不同的成像方式,不同的方法,用于倾斜和反转的不同定义评估杯取向,几个参考平面和不同的患者位置。结论:所有可用的研究缺乏杯子取向评估的均匀性;因此无法在最佳杯中取向达成共识。使用不同定义在术前规划,围绕规划和术后评价中使用不同定义时,使用导航系统不可避免地缺陷。进一步的方法,需要评估杯中杯取向。因此,术后评估应该是均匀的,因此在前部和后脱位之间区分,使用与相同的参考平面和患者在相同位置的相同的倾斜和抗扰动的定义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号