...
首页> 外文期刊>Health & social care in the community >To support and not to cure: general practitioner management of loneliness
【24h】

To support and not to cure: general practitioner management of loneliness

机译:支持和不治愈:孤独的全科医生管理

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Abstract Loneliness is associated with numerous detrimental effects on physical health, mental health, cognition and lifestyle. Older adults are one of the groups at highest risk of loneliness, and indeed about 46% of older adults in England feel lonely. Those experiencing loneliness visit their general practitioner (GP) more frequently than those who are not, which has the capacity to put a strain on GPs and primary care waiting lists and costs. This study's aim was to explore GPs' views and experiences of loneliness within their older adult patients, and to understand GPs' awareness and feelings of agency within this. Nineteen UK GPs were recruited using purposive sampling and snowballing techniques. Individual semi‐structured interviews were conducted either in person or over the telephone. Data were analysed using thematic analysis. Four overarching themes were identified from the data: Whose responsibility is it anyway?, Pandora's box of shame; Keeping distance; and Community responsibility. Themes emphasise that GPs tend to hold a medicalised and individualistic view of loneliness. This intensifies stigma which in turn creates barriers to raising the topic. GPs felt powerless in their ability to fix the ‘problem’ and tended to believe that the solution had to lie in the community, the individual or in social care rather than in primary care. The findings are discussed in the context of literature on GP management of other social problems which give rise to similar issues concerning the restrictions of the medical model and the need for joined‐up approaches in which the GP is one part of a wider social support structure. It is suggested that it might be useful for training and support for GPs to address management of social problems jointly rather than training specific to loneliness which GPs tend to see as peripheral to their core remit.
机译:摘要寂寞与对身体健康,心理健康,认知和生活方式的众多不利影响有关。老年人是孤独风险最高的群体之一,并且在英格兰的老年人占146%的群体感到孤独。那些经历孤独的人比那些不频繁地访问他们的全科医生(GP),这有能力对GPS和初级保健等待名单和成本进行压力。本研究的目的是探索其老年成年患者孤独的GPS的观点和经验,并了解在此内部的GPS的意识和感受。使用目的地采样和滚雪球技术招募了19英国GPS。个人半结构化访谈是亲自或通过电话进行的。使用主题分析分析数据。从数据中确定了四个总体主题:无论如何,谁的责任是谁?,潘多拉的耻辱盒;保持距离;和社区责任。主题强调,GPS倾向于持有孤独的医学和个人主义的观点。这加剧了耻辱,反过来创造了提高主题的障碍。 GPS在他们解决“问题”并倾向于相信该解决方案必须在社区,个人或社会护理而不是初级保健方面而不是在初级保健中的能力感到无能为力。在其他社会问题的文献中讨论了研究结果,这引起了关于医疗模式限制的类似问题以及加入联合方法的需要,其中GP是更广泛的社会支持结构的一部分。有人建议,它可能有助于培训和支持GPS,以共同地解决社会问题的管理,而不是GPS倾向于将其核心视为周边的孤独特异性的培训。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号