...
首页> 外文期刊>Health & place >Food safety vulnerability: Neighbourhood determinants of non-compliant establishments in England and Wales
【24h】

Food safety vulnerability: Neighbourhood determinants of non-compliant establishments in England and Wales

机译:食品安全漏洞:英格兰和威尔士的不合规房间的邻里决定因素

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper utilises logistic regression to identify ecological determinants of non-compliant food outlets in England and Wales. We consider socio-demographic, urbanness and business type features to better define vulnerable populations based on the characteristics of the area within which they live. We find a clear gradient of association between deprivation and non-compliance, with outlets in the most deprived areas 25% less likely (OR = 0.75) to meet hygiene standards than those in the least deprived areas. Similarly, we find outlets located in conurbation areas have a lower probability of compliance (OR = 0.678) than establishments located in rural and affluent areas. Therefore, individuals living in these neighbourhoods can be considered more situationally vulnerable than those living in rural and non-deprived areas. Whilst comparing compliance across business types, we find that takeaways and sandwich shops (OR = 0.504) and convenience retailers (OR = 0.905) are significantly less likely to meet hygiene standards compared to restaurants. This is particularly problematic for populations who may be unable to shop outside their immediate locality. Where traditional food safety interventions have failed to consider the prospect of increased risk based on proximity to unsafe and unhygienic food outlets, we re-assess the meaning of vulnerability by considering the type of neighbourhoods within which non-compliant establishments are located. In-lieu of accurate foodborne illness data, we recommend prioritised inspections for outlets in urban and deprived areas. Particularly takeaways, sandwich shops and small convenience retailers.
机译:本文利用Logistic回归来识别英格兰和威尔士的非符合食品网点的生态决定因素。我们认为社会人口统计学,城市和商业类型的特征,以便根据他们居住的区域的特征更好地定义弱势群体。我们在剥夺和不遵守方面发现了明显的关联梯度,最贫困地区的出口可能不那么可能(或= 0.75),以满足卫生标准而非最不被剥夺地区的地区。同样,我们发现有机区域的出口较低的合规性(或= 0.678),而不是农村和富裕地区的企业。因此,生活在这些社区的个人可以被认为更容易受到农村和非剥夺地区的那些人的群体。在比较跨商业类型的遵从性的情况下,我们发现外带和三明治商店(或= 0.504)和便利零售商(或= 0.905)明显不太可能与餐馆相比达到卫生标准。对于可能无法在其直接途中购物的人口尤为问题。如果传统食品安全干预措施未能考虑基于对不安全和不卫生食品出口的额外风险的前景,我们通过考虑不合规房间所在的社区类型来重新评估脆弱性的意义。代替准确的食物造成疾病数据,我们建议在城市和贫困地区的出口进行优先检查。特别是外卖,三明治商店和小型便利零售商。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号