...
首页> 外文期刊>Health promotion international >Writing peer-reviewed articles with diverse teams: considerations for novice scholars conducting community-engaged research
【24h】

Writing peer-reviewed articles with diverse teams: considerations for novice scholars conducting community-engaged research

机译:用不同的团队编写同行评审的文章:对新手学者进行社区参与研究的考虑因素

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Given the growth of interdisciplinary and community-engaged health promotion research, it has become increasingly common to conduct studies in diverse teams. While there is literature to guide collaborative research proposal development, data collection and analysis, little has been written about writing peer-reviewed publications collaboratively in teams. This gap is particularly important for junior researchers who lead articles involving diverse and community-engaged co-authors. The purpose of this article is to present a series of considerations to guide novice researchers in writing for peer-reviewed publication with diverse teams. The following considerations are addressed: justifying the value of peer-reviewed publication with non-academic partners; establishing co-author roles that respect expertise and interest; clarifying the message and audience; using the article outline as a form of engagement; knowledge translation within and beyond the academy; and multiple strategies for generating and reviewing drafts. Community-engaged research often involves collaboration with communities that have long suffered a history of colonial and extractive research practices. Authentic engagement of these partners can be supported through research practices, including manuscript development, that are transparent and that honour the voices of all team members. Ensuring meaningful participation and diverse perspectives is key to transforming research relationships and sharing new insights into seemingly intractable health problems.
机译:鉴于跨学科和社区携带的健康促进研究的增长,它越来越普遍越来越普遍在不同的团队中进行研究。虽然有文献来指导协作研究提案开发,数据收集和分析,但在团队中编写了对同行评审出版物的情况很少。这种差距对于领导涉及多元化和社区参与的共同作者的文章的初级研究人员尤为重要。本文的目的是提出一系列考虑,以指导新手研究人员以与各种团队一起审查的同伴审查的出版物。解决了以下考虑因素:与非学术伙伴的同行评审的出版物的价值辩护;建立尊重专业知识和利益的共同作者角色;澄清消息和观众;用文章大纲作为参与的形式;在学院内外的知识翻译;以及发电和审查草案的多项策略。社区从事研究往往涉及与长期遭受殖民和提取研究实践历史的社区的合作。这些合作伙伴的真实参与可以通过包括稿件开发,包括透明的研究实践,尊重所有团队成员的声音。确保有意义的参与和多样化的观点是改变研究关系的关键,并将新的见解与看似棘手的健康问题分享。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号