...
首页> 外文期刊>Heart and vessels: An international journal >Comparison of salt with low-dose furosemide and carperitide for treating acute decompensated heart failure: a single-center retrospective cohort study
【24h】

Comparison of salt with low-dose furosemide and carperitide for treating acute decompensated heart failure: a single-center retrospective cohort study

机译:盐与低剂量呋塞米和蛋白酶治疗急性失代偿性心力衰竭的比较:单中心回顾性队列研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Hypertonic saline with furosemide has been proposed for a long time as an effective therapeutic option for the treatment of acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF). We previously reported the efficacy of continuous infusion of 1.7 % hypertonic saline plus low-dose furosemide in treatment for ADHF. Although this therapeutic strategy can be a useful option for effective decongestion in treatment for ADHF, there is no study that assesses the effect and safety of saline supplementation compared with standard therapy in Japan. The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of 1.7 % hypertonic saline plus low-dose furosemide infusion compared with carperitide. We compared clinical outcomes, adverse events, and cost for patients receiving carperitide (carperitide group) with those for patients receiving 1.7 % hypertonic saline plus low-dose furosemide (salt group) during the initial hospitalization for ADHF. The cost analysis was performed on the basis of the previous report about cost-effectiveness of acute heart failure. A total of 175 ADHF patients received either carperitide (n = 111) or 1.7 % hypertonic saline plus low-dose furosemide infusion (n = 64) as initial treatment. There were no differences in length of hospital stay (27 +/- 19 vs. 25 +/- 16 day, p = 0.170) and infusion period (7.2 +/- 6.1 vs. 8.4 +/- 7.5 day, p = 0.474) between the two groups. The incidence of rehospitalization did not differ at 1 month (7.6 vs. 6.6 %, p = 1.000) and 1 year (36.8 vs. 37.7 %, p = 0.907) between the two groups. The Kaplan-Meier curves revealed no significant difference for 1 year all-cause mortality between the two groups (log-rank, p = 0.724). The single hospitalization cost was 95,314 yen lower and the yearly hospitalization cost 125,628 yen lower in the salt group compared with the carperitide group. Thus, intravenous 1.7 % hypertonic saline plus low-dose furosemide infusion is as effective as carperitide in terms of clinical outcome and is a cost-effective therapeutic strategy for the treatment of ADHF.
机译:已经提出了具有呋塞米的高渗盐水作为治疗急性失代偿性心力衰竭(ADHF)的有效治疗选择。我们之前报道了连续输注1.7%高渗盐水加低剂量呋塞米治疗ADHF的疗效。虽然这种治疗策略可以是对ADHF治疗治疗有效反驳的有用选择,但没有研究盐水补充的效果和安全性与日本标准治疗相比。该研究的目的是探讨与甘蔗酸酯相比1.7%高渗盐水加上低剂量呋塞米输注的疗效,安全性和成本效果。我们将患有蛋白酶(蛋白酶酰胺组)的患者的临床结果,不良事件和成本进行了比较,并且在初始住院期间接受1.7%高渗盐水加低剂量呋塞米(盐组)的患者。成本分析是根据先前关于急性心力衰竭成本效益的报告进行的。共有175名ADHF患者接受蛋白酶(n = 111)或1.7%高渗盐水加低剂量呋塞米输注(n = 64)作为初始治疗。医院住宿的长度没有差异(27 +/- 19 + 25 +/- 16天,P = 0.170)和输注期(7.2 +/- 6.1与8.4 +/- 7.5天,P = 0.474)两组之间。在两组之间的1个月内再生的发生率并没有在1个月内(7.6 vs.6.6%,p = 1.000)和1年(36.8与37.7%,p = 0.907)。 Kaplan-Meier曲线显示出两组之间的1年全导致死亡率没有显着差异(对数 - 秩,P = 0.724)。与甘蔗酰基集团相比,单一住院费用为95,314日元,盐集团的每年住院费用125,628日元。因此,静脉注射1.7%高渗盐水加低剂量呋塞米输注在临床结果方面与蛋白酶有效,是治疗ADHF的成本效益的治疗策略。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号